CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. v. MAYER LABORATORIES, INC.

Filing 107

STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO ANSWER SECOND AMENDED COUNTERCLAIMS re 106 Stipulation filed by Mayer Laboratories, Inc., Church & Dwight Co., Inc.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 4/15/11. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/15/2011)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ____________________________________ : : : Plaintiff, : : v. : : MAYER LABORATORIES, INC., : : Defendant. : ____________________________________: CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC., CIVIL ACTION No.: CV3:10-04429 EMC __________________________________________________________ STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO ANSWER SECOND AMENDED COUNTERCLAIMS OF DEFENDANT ; ORDER __________________________________________________________ It is hereby stipulated and agreed, by and between the undersigned attorneys for the above-captioned parties, that Plaintiff’s time to file an answer to Defendant’s second amended counterclaims is extended and that Plaintiff’s answer to Defendant’s second amended counterclaims shall be filed on or before May 3, 2011. Dated: April 14, 2011. CARTUSCIELLO & ASSOCIATES, P.C. 104 Mountainside Road Mendham, NJ 07945 T: (973) 543-8204 F: (973) 543-8201 Attorneys for Defendant s/ Neil S. Cartusciello Neil S. Cartusciello UNIT ED S PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED: April 15, 2011 Date:______________________ ___________________________________ Edward M. Chen RT U O S DISTRICT TE C TA D RDERE OO IT IS S EAST\44522706.1 NO en d M. Ch R dwar Judge E R NIA By: FO DLA PIPER LLP (US) One Liberty Place 1650 Market Street, Suite 4900 Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103 T: (215) 656-2449 F: (215) 606-2149 Attorneys for Plaintiff I attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the other signatory. By: s/ Jarod M. Bona Jarod M. Bona

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?