CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. v. MAYER LABORATORIES, INC.
Filing
248
ORDER RE UNSEALING 247 SUMMARY JUDGMENT ORDER. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 3/1/2012. (emclc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/1/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC.,
9
Plaintiff,
10
v.
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
No. C-10-4429 EMC
MAYER LABORATORIES, INC.,
12
ORDER RE UNSEALING SUMMARY
JUDGMENT ORDER
Defendants.
___________________________________/
13
14
15
16
The Court has filed its Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Plaintiff’s Motion for
17
Summary Judgment (“MSJ Order”) under seal. Docket No. 247. The MSJ Order denies Church &
18
Dwight's ("C&D's") motion for summary judgment as to Mayer's tortious interference with contract
19
counterclaim, and grants C&D's motion for summary judgment as to all other counterclaims.
20
///
21
///
22
///
23
///
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
1
Absent objection from the parties, the Court will publicly file the MSJ Order without
2
redactions 14 days from the date of this order. The parties are directed to file any objections to the
3
Court’s public release of the MSJ Order within 7 days of the date of this order. Any objecting party
4
shall propose redactions to the MSJ Order. Parties are instructed to propose only those redactions
5
that are narrowly tailored and necessary in compliance with Local Rule 79-5, and shall justify any
6
proposed redactions. Any response to an opposing party’s proposed redactions shall be filed within
7
14 days of the date of this order. No replies will be accepted.
8
9
IT IS SO ORDERED.
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Dated: March 1, 2012
_________________________
EDWARD M. CHEN
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?