CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. v. MAYER LABORATORIES, INC.

Filing 248

ORDER RE UNSEALING 247 SUMMARY JUDGMENT ORDER. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 3/1/2012. (emclc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/1/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC., 9 Plaintiff, 10 v. 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court No. C-10-4429 EMC MAYER LABORATORIES, INC., 12 ORDER RE UNSEALING SUMMARY JUDGMENT ORDER Defendants. ___________________________________/ 13 14 15 16 The Court has filed its Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Plaintiff’s Motion for 17 Summary Judgment (“MSJ Order”) under seal. Docket No. 247. The MSJ Order denies Church & 18 Dwight's ("C&D's") motion for summary judgment as to Mayer's tortious interference with contract 19 counterclaim, and grants C&D's motion for summary judgment as to all other counterclaims. 20 /// 21 /// 22 /// 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 1 Absent objection from the parties, the Court will publicly file the MSJ Order without 2 redactions 14 days from the date of this order. The parties are directed to file any objections to the 3 Court’s public release of the MSJ Order within 7 days of the date of this order. Any objecting party 4 shall propose redactions to the MSJ Order. Parties are instructed to propose only those redactions 5 that are narrowly tailored and necessary in compliance with Local Rule 79-5, and shall justify any 6 proposed redactions. Any response to an opposing party’s proposed redactions shall be filed within 7 14 days of the date of this order. No replies will be accepted. 8 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: March 1, 2012 _________________________ EDWARD M. CHEN United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?