CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. v. MAYER LABORATORIES, INC.
Filing
256
STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL (on certain claims and counterclaim) Case is still active. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 3/14/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/14/2012) Modified on 3/14/2012 (bpf, COURT STAFF).
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
____________________________________
:
:
:
Plaintiff,
:
:
v.
:
:
MAYER LABORATORIES, INC.,
:
:
Defendant.
:
____________________________________:
CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC.,
CIVIL ACTION
No.: CV10-04429 EMC
_____________________
STIPULATION
_____________________
Pursuant to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff Church &
Dwight Co., Inc. hereby dismisses with prejudice its remaining claims in this action, Claims III
through X, and Defendant Mayer Laboratories, Inc. hereby dismisses with prejudice its
remaining claim in this action, Counterclaim VI, with each party to bear its own costs and
attorneys’ fees.
EAST\48064992. 1
Date: March 13, 2012
Respectfully submitted,
_s/Carl W. Hittinger_____________________
Carl W. Hittinger (pro hac)
Lesli C. Esposito (pro hac)
Jarod M. Bona (CA 234327)
DLA PIPER LLP (US)
1650 Market Street, Suite 4900
Philadelphia, PA 19103
T: (215) 656-2449
F: (215) 606-2149
Attorneys for Plaintiff Church & Dwight
_s/Neil S. Cartusciello_________________
Neil S. Cartusciello (pro hac)
CARTUSCIELLO & ASSOCIATES, P.C.
104 Mountainside Road
Mendham, NJ 07945
T: (973) 543-8204
F: (973) 543-8201
Paul F. Novak (pro hac)
Gary S. Snitow (pro hac)
Peter Safirstein (pro hac)
Peggy Wedgworth (pro hac)
MILBERG LLP
One Kennedy Square
777 Woodward Ave, Suite 890
Detroit, Michigan 4822
Attorneys for Defendant Mayer Labs
UNIT
ED
S
RT
U
O
S DISTRICT
TE
IT IS SO ORDERED:A
C
T
EAST\48064992. 1
A
H
LI
RT
ER
FO
NO
R NIA
ERED
_______________
O ORD
S
Edward M. Chen IT IS
U.S. District Judge
en
d M. Ch
e Edwar
Judg
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?