CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC. v. MAYER LABORATORIES, INC.

Filing 256

STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL (on certain claims and counterclaim) Case is still active. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 3/14/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/14/2012) Modified on 3/14/2012 (bpf, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ____________________________________ : : : Plaintiff, : : v. : : MAYER LABORATORIES, INC., : : Defendant. : ____________________________________: CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC., CIVIL ACTION No.: CV10-04429 EMC _____________________ STIPULATION _____________________ Pursuant to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff Church & Dwight Co., Inc. hereby dismisses with prejudice its remaining claims in this action, Claims III through X, and Defendant Mayer Laboratories, Inc. hereby dismisses with prejudice its remaining claim in this action, Counterclaim VI, with each party to bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees. EAST\48064992. 1 Date: March 13, 2012 Respectfully submitted, _s/Carl W. Hittinger_____________________ Carl W. Hittinger (pro hac) Lesli C. Esposito (pro hac) Jarod M. Bona (CA 234327) DLA PIPER LLP (US) 1650 Market Street, Suite 4900 Philadelphia, PA 19103 T: (215) 656-2449 F: (215) 606-2149 Attorneys for Plaintiff Church & Dwight _s/Neil S. Cartusciello_________________ Neil S. Cartusciello (pro hac) CARTUSCIELLO & ASSOCIATES, P.C. 104 Mountainside Road Mendham, NJ 07945 T: (973) 543-8204 F: (973) 543-8201 Paul F. Novak (pro hac) Gary S. Snitow (pro hac) Peter Safirstein (pro hac) Peggy Wedgworth (pro hac) MILBERG LLP One Kennedy Square 777 Woodward Ave, Suite 890 Detroit, Michigan 4822 Attorneys for Defendant Mayer Labs UNIT ED S RT U O S DISTRICT TE IT IS SO ORDERED:A C T EAST\48064992. 1 A H LI RT ER FO NO R NIA ERED _______________ O ORD S Edward M. Chen IT IS U.S. District Judge en d M. Ch e Edwar Judg N F D IS T IC T O R C

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?