San Mateo Electrical Workers Health Care Trust et al v. Crown Electric, Inc.
Filing
37
ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 12/01/2011. (tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/1/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
RICHARD K. GROSBOLL, Bar No. 99729
BENJAMIN K LUNCH, Bar No. 246015
CHLOE QUAIL, Bar No. 262797
NEYHART, ANDERSON, FLYNN & GROSBOLL
369 Pine Street, Suite 800
San Francisco, CA 94104-6702
TEL: (415) 677-9440
FAX: (415) 677-9445
Email: cquail@neyhartlaw.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
(San Francisco Division)
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
)
SAN MATEO ELECTRICAL
WORKERS HEALTH CARE TRUST; )
INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD )
OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS, LOCAL )
UNION 617; SAN MATEO COUNTY )
)
ELECTRICAL CONSTRUCTION
INDUSTRY RETIREMENT TRUST; )
)
SAN MATEO ELECTRICAL
)
WORKERS EDUCATION AND
TRAINING PLAN; Dominic Nolan, as )
Trustee of the above TRUSTS; and
)
)
NATIONAL ELECTRICAL
)
CONTRACTORS ASSOCIATION,
)
SAN MATEO CHAPTER,
18
Plaintiffs,
19
vs.
20
CROWN ELECTRIC, INC., an entity,
21
22
Defendant.
Case No. 10-cv-04430-TH
[Proposed] ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Location:
Courtroom:
Judge:
450 Golden Gate Avenue
San Francisco, CA 94102
Courtroom C, 19th Floor
Hon. Thelton Henderson
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
Case No. 10-cv-04430-TH
[PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL
1
2
[PROPOSED] ORDER:
The parties hereto, having advised the Court that they have agreed to a settlement of this
3
action, seek to have this action dismissed. Thus, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is
4
dismissed without prejudice
R NIA
.H
LI
ER
FO
helton E
Judge T
H
11
RT
10
___________________________________
U.S. District Court Judge
THELTON HENDERSON
n
enderso
NO
9
12/1/2011
Dated: _______________
A
8
UNIT
ED
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
6
S
5
N
12
D IS T IC T
R
OF
C
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Case No. 10-cv-04430-TH
[PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?