San Mateo Electrical Workers Health Care Trust et al v. Crown Electric, Inc.

Filing 37

ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 12/01/2011. (tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/1/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 RICHARD K. GROSBOLL, Bar No. 99729 BENJAMIN K LUNCH, Bar No. 246015 CHLOE QUAIL, Bar No. 262797 NEYHART, ANDERSON, FLYNN & GROSBOLL 369 Pine Street, Suite 800 San Francisco, CA 94104-6702 TEL: (415) 677-9440 FAX: (415) 677-9445 Email: cquail@neyhartlaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiff 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 (San Francisco Division) 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 ) SAN MATEO ELECTRICAL WORKERS HEALTH CARE TRUST; ) INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD ) OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS, LOCAL ) UNION 617; SAN MATEO COUNTY ) ) ELECTRICAL CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY RETIREMENT TRUST; ) ) SAN MATEO ELECTRICAL ) WORKERS EDUCATION AND TRAINING PLAN; Dominic Nolan, as ) Trustee of the above TRUSTS; and ) ) NATIONAL ELECTRICAL ) CONTRACTORS ASSOCIATION, ) SAN MATEO CHAPTER, 18 Plaintiffs, 19 vs. 20 CROWN ELECTRIC, INC., an entity, 21 22 Defendant. Case No. 10-cv-04430-TH [Proposed] ORDER OF DISMISSAL Location: Courtroom: Judge: 450 Golden Gate Avenue San Francisco, CA 94102 Courtroom C, 19th Floor Hon. Thelton Henderson ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 Case No. 10-cv-04430-TH [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL 1 2 [PROPOSED] ORDER: The parties hereto, having advised the Court that they have agreed to a settlement of this 3 action, seek to have this action dismissed. Thus, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is 4 dismissed without prejudice R NIA .H LI ER FO helton E Judge T H 11 RT 10 ___________________________________ U.S. District Court Judge THELTON HENDERSON n enderso NO 9 12/1/2011 Dated: _______________ A 8 UNIT ED 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O 6 S 5 N 12 D IS T IC T R OF C 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 Case No. 10-cv-04430-TH [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?