Britton v. Johnson & Johnson et al

Filing 8

STIPULATION AND ORDER Extending Time to Respond to the Complaint. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 11/3/10. (tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/4/2010)

Britton v. Johnson & Johnson et al

Doc. 8

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Richard B. Goetz (S.B. # 115666) [e-mail] Carlos M. Lazatin (S.B. # 229650) [e-mail] O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP 400 South Hope Street Los Angeles, California 90071-2899 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Defendants JOHNSON & JOHNSON, McNEIL-PPC, INC., and JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER PRODUCTS, INC., Scott Edward Cole, Esq. (S.B. #160744) [e-mail] Matthew R. Bainer, Esq. (S.B. #220972) [e-mail] Hannah R. Salassi, Esq. (S.B. #230117) [e-mail] SCOTT COLE & ASSOCIATES, APC 1970 Broadway, Ninth Floor Oakland, California 94612 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Plaintiff and the Putative Plaintiff Classes UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case No. 3:10-cv-04450-TEH CHARLENE A. BRITTON, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME Plaintiff, TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, McNEILPPC, INC., and JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER PRODUCTS, INC., Defendants. Judge: Hon. Thelton E. Henderson Courtroom: 12 Complaint Filed: Oct. 1, 2010

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT 3:10-cv-04450-TEH
4367373v.1

Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and among the undersigned attorneys for Plaintiff Charlene Britton and the putative Class ("Plaintiff") and the undersigned attorneys for Defendants Johnson & Johnson, McNeil-PPC, Inc., and Johnson Consumer Products, Inc. ("Defendants") that: 1. Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1(a), the time for Defendants to answer, move

with respect to, or otherwise respond to the Complaint in this action is hereby extended until and including December 2, 2010; 2. A stipulation between the parties to extend Defendants' time to answer

or otherwise respond to the Complaint to December 2, 2010, will not alter any event or deadline already fixed by Court Order; 3. Execution of this stipulation is not a waiver of any claims or defenses

Plaintiff or Defendants may otherwise have, and all such claims and defenses are expressly reserved by Plaintiff and Defendants; and 4. Electronically reproduced or facsimile signatures on this stipulation

shall have the same affect as original signatures. Dated: November 1, 2010 By: O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP _/s/ Richard B. Goetz Richard B. Goetz 400 South Hope Street Los Angeles, California 90071-2899 Attorneys for Defendants Johnson & Johnson, McNeil-PPC, Inc., and Johnson & Johnson Consumer Products, Inc. SCOTT COLE & ASSOCIATES, APC _/s/ Scott Edward Cole Scott Edward Cole, Esq. 1970 Broadway, Ninth Floor Oakland, California 94612 By: 1
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT 3:10-cv-04450-TEH

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
UNIT ED
S DISTRICT TE C TA 11/3/10

Attorneys for Plaintiff Representative Plaintiff and the putative Plaintiff Classes ATTESTATION OF FILING PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 45 I hereby attest that we have obtained concurrence in the filing of this document from plaintiff's counsel identified in the signature block above.

/s/ Richard B. Goetz Richard B. Goetz Attorneys for Defendants Johnson & Johnson, McNeil-PPC, Inc., and Johnson & Johnson Consumer Products, Inc.

15 16 17

S

14

Judg

20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

N

F D IS T IC T O R

A

19

ER

C

LI

FO

18

n E. H e Thelto

enderso

n

R NIA

I

ORD T IS SO

ERED

RT U O

NO

RT
H

2

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT 3:10-cv-04450-TEH