Wistron Corporation et al v. Phillip M. Adams & Associates LLC

Filing 86

STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL re 85 Stipulation, filed by Wistron Infocomm Technology (America) Corporation, Aopen Incorporated, Wistron InfoComm (Texas) Corporation, Wistron Corporation, Aopen America Incorporated. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 9/28/11. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/28/2011)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14

Howard Chen (SBN 257393)
[e-mail]
Harold H. Davis, Jr. (SBN 235552)
[e-mail]
Irene Yang (SBN 245464)
[e-mail]
K&L GATES LLP
Four Embarcadero Center, Suite 1200
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Jeffrey M. Ratinoff (SBN 197241)
[e-mail]
K&L GATES LLP
630 Hansen Way
Palo Alto, CA 94304
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

Ezekiel R. Dumke IV (SBN 259407)
[e-mail]
QUINN DUMKE LLC
2150 S. 1300 E., Suite 500
Salt Lake City, Utah 84106
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 801.746.2411
Attorneys for Defendants
PHILLIP M. ADAMS & ASSOCIATES,
L.L.C., AFTG-TG, L.L.C. AND PHILLIP M.
ADAMS

Attorneys for Plaintiffs
WISTRON CORPORATION, WISTRON
INFOCOMM (TEXAS) CORPORATION,
WISTRON INFOCOMM TECHNOLOGY
(AMERICA) CORPORATION,
AOPEN INCORPORATED AND
AOPEN AMERICA INCORPORATED

15

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

16

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

17

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

18
19
20
21

WISTRON CORPORATION; WISTRON
INFOCOMM (TEXAS) CORPORATION; and
WISTRON INFOCOMM TECHNOLOGY
(AMERICA) CORPORATION; AOPEN
INCORPORATED and AOPEN AMERICA
INCORPORATED;

22
23
24
25
26
27

Plaintiffs,

Case No. 3:10-CV-04458-EMC (MEJ)
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER RE: DISMISSAL
Complaint Filed: October 1, 2010
Trial Date: None

vs.
PHILLIP M. ADAMS & ASSOCIATES, LLC;
AFTG-TG LLC; and PHILLIP M. ADAMS,
Defendants.
AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS.

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: DISMISSAL; Case No. 3:10-cv-04458-EMC (MEJ)

1

Plaintiffs Wistron Corporation, SMS Infocomm Corporation (formerly Wistron Infocomm

2

(Texas) Corporation), Wistron Infocomm Technology (America) Corporation, AOpen Inc., and

3

AOpen America Inc. (collectively “Plaintiffs”); and Defendants Phillip M. Adams & Associates,

4

LLC (“PMAA”), AFTG-TG LLC (“AFTG”), and Phillip M. Adams (collectively, “Defendants”),

5

through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil

6

Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) and (c) that all claims and counterclaims between and among Plaintiffs and

7

Defendants shall be dismissed in their entirety, with prejudice, and with each party to bear its own

8

attorneys' fees and costs.

9
K&L GATES LLP

10
11
12

Dated: September 26, 2011

By:

13
14

/s/ Jeffrey M. Ratinoff
Harold H. Davis, Jr.
Jeffrey M. Ratinoff
Irene Yang
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
WISTRON CORPORATION, WISTRON
INFOCOMM (TEXAS) CORPORATION,
WISTRON INFOCOMM TECHNOLOGY
(AMERICA) CORPORATION,
AOPEN INCORPORATED AND
AOPEN AMERICA INCORPORATED

15
16
17
18
19
20

QUINN DUMKE LLC

21
22
23
24
25

Dated: September 26, 2011

By:

/s/ Ezekiel R. Dumke IV
Ezekiel R. Dumke IV
Attorneys for Defendants
PHILLIP M. ADAMS & ASSOCIATES. LLC,
AFTG-TG, LLC, AND PHILLIP M. ADAMS

26
27
28
1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: DISMISSAL; Case No. 3:10-cv-04458-EMC (MEJ)

1
2
3

ATTESTATION PER GENERAL ORDER 45
In compliance with General Order 45, X.B. of this Court, concurrence in the filing of this
document has been obtained from the other signatory.

4
5
6
7
8
9
10

Dated: September 26, 2011

K&L GATES LLP
By: /s/ Jeffrey M. Ratinoff
Jeffrey M. Ratinoff
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
WISTRON CORPORATION, WISTRON
INFOCOMM (TEXAS) CORPORATION,
WISTRON INFOCOMM TECHNOLOGY
(AMERICA) CORPORATION,
AOPEN INCORPORATED AND
AOPEN AMERICA INCORPORATED

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: DISMISSAL; Case No. 3:10-cv-04458-EMC (MEJ)

1
2
3

ORDER
Pursuant to stipulation of the parties through their counsel of record, and
for good cause, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

4

1.

5

prejudice;

6

2.

Each party is to bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees; and

7

3.

All pre-trial dates currently scheduled are vacated.

8

IT IS SO ORDERED.

RT

13

ER

15

A

H

14

R NIA

Honorable Edward M. ChenChen
.
United StatesdDistrict rd M Judge
dwa Court
Ju ge E

NO

12

By:

FO

11

9/28
Dated: ________________, 2011

D

RDERE

OO
IT IS S

LI

10

UNIT
ED

9

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

RT
U
O

S

This Action, including all claims and counterclaims, is hereby dismissed with

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: DISMISSAL; Case No. 3:10-cv-04458-EMC (MEJ)