Newport et al v. Burger King Corporation

Filing 165

ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR BURGER KING CORPORATION TO FILE MOTION TO DISMISS WILLIE C. COOK'S AMENDED CROSS-CLAIM by Hon. William Alsup granting in part and denying in part #161 Motion.(whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/31/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 ROY D. NEWPORT, et al., Plaintiffs, 11 12 13 14 v. BURGER KING CORPORATION, Defendant. / 15 16 No. C 10-04511 WHA AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS. ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR BURGER KING CORPORATION TO FILE MOTION TO DISMISS WILLIE C. COOK’S AMENDED CROSS-CLAIM / 17 18 Burger King Corporation requests additional time to file a motion to dismiss counter- 19 defendant Willie C. Cook’s amended cross-claim given some assertedly misleading interim 20 communications by Cook’s counsel (Dkt. No. 161). For good cause shown, the request is 21 GRANTED, with the following conditions: the motion shall be no more than 15 pages, the 22 opposition shall be no more than 15 pages, and the reply shall be no more than 10 pages (all such 23 limits excluding exhibits). Burger King shall file its motion (or respond by answer) by 24 SEPTEMBER 1, 2011. Burger King’s alternative request that this order enforce the parties’ 25 agreement to dismiss Cook’s amended cross-claim without prejudice because Burger King 26 accepted Cook’s offer to stipulate to dismissal without prejudice is DENIED. 27 IT IS SO ORDERED. 28 Dated: August 31, 2011. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?