Newport et al v. Burger King Corporation

Filing 67

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Signed by Judge Alsup on April 15, 2011. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/15/2011)

1
2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10

ROY D. NEWPORT, et al.,
No. C 10-04511 WHA
Plaintiffs,

11
12

v.

13

BURGER KING CORPORATION,

14

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Defendant.
_______________________________/

15
16

Plaintiffs have filed a motion for leave to file a second amended complaint, noticing a

17

hearing for May 5 (Dkt. No. 55). Under the civil local rules, defendant, who is represented by

18

counsel, was required to file an opposition brief (or a statement of nonopposition) to the pending

19

motion by April 14. No response was filed. Defendant is therefore ordered to show cause for its

20

failure to respond to the motion, including via a declaration under oath, by APRIL 20, 2011. This

21

order does not constitute permission to file a late opposition to the pending motion. The hearing

22

on May 5, 2011, is VACATED. A new hearing shall be set by the Court if necessary.

23
IT IS SO ORDERED.
24
25
Dated: April 15, 2011.
26
27
28

WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE