Newport et al v. Burger King Corporation

Filing 67

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Signed by Judge Alsup on April 15, 2011. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/15/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 ROY D. NEWPORT, et al., No. C 10-04511 WHA Plaintiffs, 11 12 v. 13 BURGER KING CORPORATION, 14 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Defendant. _______________________________/ 15 16 Plaintiffs have filed a motion for leave to file a second amended complaint, noticing a 17 hearing for May 5 (Dkt. No. 55). Under the civil local rules, defendant, who is represented by 18 counsel, was required to file an opposition brief (or a statement of nonopposition) to the pending 19 motion by April 14. No response was filed. Defendant is therefore ordered to show cause for its 20 failure to respond to the motion, including via a declaration under oath, by APRIL 20, 2011. This 21 order does not constitute permission to file a late opposition to the pending motion. The hearing 22 on May 5, 2011, is VACATED. A new hearing shall be set by the Court if necessary. 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 25 Dated: April 15, 2011. 26 27 28 WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?