White v. Cash

Filing 72

ORDER of USCA (13-71458): Petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus directing the district court to rule on his28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for writ of habeas corpus. The record reflects that onJune 21, 2013, the district court entered an order and judgment denying petitionershabeas corpus petition. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is deniedas moot.The motion to proceed in forma pauperis is also denied as moot.DENIED. (ysS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/9/2013)

Case: 13-71458

07/09/2013

ID: 8695574

DktEntry: 4

Page: 1 of 1

FILED
JUL 09 2013

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

In re: LARRY LIONEL WHITE.

No. 13-71458

LARRY LIONEL WHITE,

D.C. No. 3:10-cv-04555-SI
Northern District of California,
San Francisco

Petitioner,
v.

ORDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF
CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO,
Respondent,
B. M. CASH,
Real Party in Interest.

Before: KOZINSKI, Chief Judge, CANBY and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.
Petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus directing the district court to rule on his
28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for writ of habeas corpus. The record reflects that on
June 21, 2013, the district court entered an order and judgment denying petitioner’s
habeas corpus petition. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied
as moot.
The motion to proceed in forma pauperis is also denied as moot.
DENIED.
hmb/MOATT