Arch Insurance Company v. Mitchell Engineering Company et al

Filing 100

ORDER Further Case Management Conference set for 11/18/2011 03:00 PM. (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/27/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 JAMES DIWIK (STATE BAR NO. 164016) MATTHEW FISCHER (STATE BAR NO. 191451) Sedgwick LLP One Market Plaza, Steuart Tower, 8th Floor San Francisco, CA 94105-1008 Telephone: 415.781.7900 Facsimile: 415.781.2635 james.diwik@sedgwicklaw.com david.mangini@sedgwicklaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant ARCH INSURANCE COMPANY 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 12 13 ARCH INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Case No. CV 10 04558–SI v. MITCHELL ENGINEERING COMPANY, a California Corporation; S.F. EQUIPMENT, a California Corporation; S.F. HOLDINGS INC., a California Corporation; MICHAEL SILVA, an individual; STEPHANIE SILVA, an individual; CURTIS F. MITCHELL, an individual; CRYSTAL MITCHELL, an individual; CURTIS F. MITCHELL in his capacity as TRUSTEE OF THE CURTIS F. MITCHELL FAMILY TRUST; MACDONALD AUXILIARY CORPORATION, solely in its capacity as trustee, Defendants. [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO CONTINUE THE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE TO NOVEMBER 18, 2011 Honorable Susan Illston Complaint Filed: October 7, 2010 23 24 AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS. 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO CONTINUE INITIAL CMC SF/2418484v1 ORDER 1 2 PURSUANT TO THE FOREGOING STIPULATION, IT IS ORDERED THAT the 3 September 30, 2011 initial case management conference is continued to November 18, 2011 at 4 3:00 p.m. 5 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 7 9/26/11 Dated: _____________________, 2011 Hon. Susan Illston United States District Judge 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO CONTINUE INITIAL CMC SF/2418484v1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?