Arch Insurance Company v. Mitchell Engineering Company et al
Filing
100
ORDER Further Case Management Conference set for 11/18/2011 03:00 PM. (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/27/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
JAMES DIWIK (STATE BAR NO. 164016)
MATTHEW FISCHER (STATE BAR NO. 191451)
Sedgwick LLP
One Market Plaza, Steuart Tower, 8th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94105-1008
Telephone:
415.781.7900
Facsimile:
415.781.2635
james.diwik@sedgwicklaw.com
david.mangini@sedgwicklaw.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
ARCH INSURANCE COMPANY
7
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
12
13
ARCH INSURANCE COMPANY,
Plaintiff,
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
Case No. CV 10 04558–SI
v.
MITCHELL ENGINEERING COMPANY,
a California Corporation; S.F. EQUIPMENT,
a California Corporation; S.F. HOLDINGS
INC., a California Corporation; MICHAEL
SILVA, an individual; STEPHANIE SILVA,
an individual; CURTIS F. MITCHELL,
an individual; CRYSTAL MITCHELL,
an individual; CURTIS F. MITCHELL in his
capacity as TRUSTEE OF THE CURTIS F.
MITCHELL FAMILY TRUST;
MACDONALD AUXILIARY
CORPORATION, solely in its capacity as
trustee,
Defendants.
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE THE
INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE TO NOVEMBER 18,
2011
Honorable Susan Illston
Complaint Filed: October 7, 2010
23
24
AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS.
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO CONTINUE INITIAL CMC
SF/2418484v1
ORDER
1
2
PURSUANT TO THE FOREGOING STIPULATION, IT IS ORDERED THAT the
3
September 30, 2011 initial case management conference is continued to November 18, 2011 at
4
3:00 p.m.
5
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
7
9/26/11
Dated: _____________________, 2011
Hon. Susan Illston
United States District Judge
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO CONTINUE INITIAL CMC
SF/2418484v1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?