Best Buy Co., Inc. et al v. AU Optronics Corp. et al
Filing
522
ORDER RE NEC (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 8/9/2013)
Best Buy Co., Inc. et al v. AU Optronics Corp. et al
Doc. 522
1
2
3
4
5
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
IN RE: TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL) ANTITRUST
LITIGATION
/
No. M 07-1827 SI
MDL. No. 1827
This Order Relates to:
ORDER RE NEC
11
12
13
14
15
16
Best Buy v. AU Optronics Corp. et al.,
Case No. 10-CV-4572,
Best Buy v. Toshiba Corp. et al.,
Case No. 12-CV-4114
/
17
Defendants object to Best Buy’s proposed summary witness charts and testimony concerning
18
NEC Corporation, NEC LCD Technologies, Ltd., NEC Display Solutions, Ltd and NEC Display
19
Solutions of America, Inc. as irrelevant and confusing, since this Court previously excluded claims for
20
damages based on purchases from NEC Corporation, NEC Corporation of America and NEC Display
21
Solutions of America. See MDL Dkt. No. 7419 at 9. Best Buy has stipulated that its claims against both
22
HannStar and Toshiba are governed by that exclusion order, but argues that it should be permitted to
23
recover damages for direct purchases from the other NEC finished product vendors under the ownership
24
or control exception to Illinois Brick found in Royal Printing.
25
The Court disagrees. The exclusion order clearly applies to damages based on purchases from
26
the three NEC entities, and Best Buy stipulates that it applies its claims against both HannStar and
27
Toshiba. The notice concerns on which the exclusion order was originally premised would be
28
exacerbated by introduction now, in the midst of trial, of a new theory to bring damages based on
Dockets.Justia.com
1
2
purchases from these excluded entities back into the case.
Defendants’ objection to the NEC summary chart and testimony is sustained.
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6
7
Dated: August 9, 2013
___________________________
SUSAN ILLSTON
United States District Judge
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?