Best Buy Co., Inc. et al v. AU Optronics Corp. et al

Filing 616

ORDER granting Stipulation to amend briefing schedule 615 . Signed by Judge Susan Illston on 10/16/13. (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/16/2013)

1
2
3

LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
Yi-Chin Ho (Bar No. 204834)
355 South Grand Avenue
Los Angeles, CA 90071-1560
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: +1.213.891.8763

4
5
6
7
8

LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
Belinda S Lee (Bar No. 199635)
505 Montgomery Street, Suite 2000
San Francisco, CA 94111-6538
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: +1.415.395.8095
Attorneys for Defendant
HannStar Display Corporation

9
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
13
14
Master File No. 3:07-md-1827 SI
MDL No. 1827

15
16

IN RE: TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL)
ANTITRUST LITIGATION

17
_____________________________________
18
19
20

Best Buy Co., Inc., et al. v. AU Optronics
Corp., et al., No. 10-cv-4572 SI

Individual Case File No. 10-cv-4572 SI
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
TO AMEND BRIEFING AND HEARING
SCHEDULE PURSUANT TO FRCP 6(B)
AND NORTHERN DISTRICT CIVIL
LOCAL RULES 6-1, 6-3, 7-10 AND 7-11
[MDL Dkt. Nos. 8606, 8611, 8610, 8612, 8653]

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
LOS ANGELES

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO
AMEND BRIEFING AND HEARING SCHEDULE
NO. 07-MD-1827 SI; NO. 10-CV-4572 SI

1

WHEREAS Defendant HannStar Display Corporation (“HannStar”) engaged Latham &

2

Watkins LLP on October 10, 2013 to replace Freitas Tseng & Kaufman LLP as its counsel of

3

record in this matter and has filed a Motion to Substitute Counsel concurrently herewith;

4
5
6

WHEREAS HannStar seeks an extension of certain upcoming briefing deadlines and
dates to allow Latham & Watkins sufficient time to assume its new role as HannStar’s counsel;
WHEREAS counsel for HannStar and counsel for Plaintiffs Best Buy Co., Inc., Best Buy

7

Purchasing LLC, Best Buy Enterprise Services, Inc., Best Buy Stores, L.P., Best Buy.com,

8

L.L.C., and Magnolia Hi-Fi, Inc. (“the Best Buy Plaintiffs”) have met and conferred and agree

9

that an extension of certain deadlines and dates would be appropriate;

10

WHEREAS the schedule proposed below will result in the parties’ related submissions

11

being filed at least nine days in advance of the proposed new hearing on these matters; and

12

WHEREAS HannStar has agreed to forebear from making any further requests for

13

information (discovery) to or asserting any entitlement to further information (discovery) from

14

the Best Buy Plaintiffs other than in HannStar’s (a) opposition to the Best Buy Plaintiffs’ Motion

15

for Attorneys’ Fees and Costs and (b) opposition to the Best Buy Plaintiffs’ Bill of Costs.

16

Further, the parties agree that nothing in this Stipulation shall be construed as an admission by

17

either party as to the relevance of this information, nor shall anything in this Stipulation affect or

18

alter the burden of proof applicable to the pending motions;

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED between the parties that the following
schedule should be adopted:
Event

Previous Date

New Date

HannStar’s Opposition to the Best Buy
Plaintiffs’ Motion for Fees and Costs

October 16, 2013

October 30, 2013

The Best Buy Plaintiffs’ Opposition to
HannStar’s Motion for Judgment as a
Matter of Law

October 16, 2013

October 30, 2013

HannStar’s Opposition to the Best Buy
Plaintiffs’ Bill of Costs

October 21, 2013

November 4, 2013

HannStar’s Reply ISO Motion for
Judgment as a Matter of Law

October 23, 2013

November 13, 2013

27
28
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
LOS ANGELES

1

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO
AMEND BRIEFING AND HEARING SCHEDULE
NO. 07-MD-1827 SI; NO. 10-CV-4572 SI

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

The Best Buy Plaintiffs’ Reply ISO Motion October 30, 2013
for Fees and Costs

November 13, 2013

The Best Buy Plaintiffs’ Reply ISO Bill of
Costs

November 4, 2013

November 13, 2013

November 15, 2013

November 22, 2013
(or such other date the
Court may choose)

Hearing of the Following Motions:
1. The Best Buy Plaintiffs’ Motion for
Fees and Costs (MDL Dkt. No. 8610)
2. The Best Buy Plaintiffs’ Bill of Costs
(MDL Dkt. No. 8612)
3. The Best Buy Plaintiffs’ Motion to
Amend the September 4, 2013
Judgment Against HannStar to Reflect
Treble Damages (MDL Dkt. No. 8611)
4. HannStar’s Motion to Vacate Judgment
Pursuant to FRCP 60(b) (MDL Dkt.
No. 8606)
5. HannStar’s Motion for Judgment as a
Matter of Law Pursuant to FRCP 50(b)
(MDL Dkt. No. 8653)

13
14

Dated: October 15, 2013

LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
By: ___/s/Yi-Chin Ho______________________
Yi-Chin Ho
Attorneys for Defendant
HANNSTAR DISPLAY CORPORATION

15
16
17
18

Dated: October 15, 2013

ROBINS, KAPLAN, MILLER & CIRESI L.L.P.
By: ___/s/Michael Geibelson_________________
Michael Geibelson
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
BEST BUY CO., INC.; BEST BUY
PURCHASING LLC; BEST BUY
ENTERPRISE SERVICES, INC.; BEST BUY
STORES, L.P.; BESTBUY.COM, L.L.C.;
AND MAGNOLIA HI-FI, INC.

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26

IT IS SO ORDERED.
16
Dated: October __, 2013

27

__________________________________________
Honorable Susan Illston
United States District Court Judge

LA\3351459.2

28
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
LOS ANGELES

2

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO
AMEND BRIEFING AND HEARING SCHEDULE
NO. 07-MD-1827 SI; NO. 10-CV-4572 SI