Best Buy Co., Inc. et al v. AU Optronics Corp. et al

Filing 708

ORDER for Entry of Judgment and Judgment. Signed by Judge Susan Illston on 6/6/16. (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/6/2016)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

ROBINS KAPLAN LLP
Roman M. Silberfeld, Bar No. 62783
[e-mail]
Bernice Conn, Bar No. 161594
[e-mail]
Michael A. Geibelson, Bar No. 179970
[e-mail]
David Martinez, Bar No. 193183
[e-mail]
2049 Century Park East, Suite 3400
Los Angeles, CA 90067-3208
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

8
9

M INNEAPOLIS

A TTORNEYS A T L AW

R OBINS K APLAN LLP

10

Attorneys For Plaintiffs Best Buy Co., Inc.; Best Buy
Purchasing LLC; Best Buy Enterprise Services,
Inc.; Best Buy Stores, L.P.; BestBuy.com, L.L.C.;
and Magnolia Hi-Fi, Inc.

11
12

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

13

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

14

IN RE TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL)
ANTITRUST LITIGATION

Master File No. 07-MD-1827 SI
MDL No. 1827

15
16

This Document Relates To:

17

Best Buy Co., Inc. v. AU Optronics Corp., et al.,
Case No. 10-CV-4572 SI

18

Individual Cases:
Case No. 10-CV-4572
AMENDED [PROPOSED] ORDER
FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT AND
[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT

19
The Honorable Susan Illston
20
21
22
23
24

TO THIS HONORABLE COURT AND ALL INTERESTED PERSONS AND
PARTIES:
WHEREAS the Best Buy Plaintiffs filed a Notice of Motion for Fees and Costs on

25

September 18, 2013 (Dkt. 595 in Case No. 10-CV-4572; and its related papers Dkt. 594; Dkt.

26

Nos. 8610, 8612 in Case No. 07-MD-1827 SI);

27
28
Case No. 3:07-MD-1827 SI
86802799.1

AMENDED [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR
ENTRY OF JUDGMENT AND [PROPOSED]
JUDGMENT

1
2
3
4
5

WHEREAS the Court referred the matter for determination by the Special Master in the
first instance (Dkt. 651 in Case No. 10-CV-4572);
WHEREAS the Special Master concluded that the Best Buy Plaintiffs should be awarded
$1.75 million in attorneys’ fees and $104,167.97 in costs;
WHEREAS the Court adopted the Special Master’s recommendations in full and ordered

6

that the Best Buy Plaintiffs should be awarded $1.75 million in attorneys’ fees and $104,167.97

7

in costs (Dkt. 685 in Case No. 10-CV-4572);

8
9

M INNEAPOLIS

A TTORNEYS A T L AW

R OBINS K APLAN LLP

10
11
12

WHEREAS this award of attorneys’ fees and costs was affirmed by the United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (Dkt. 697 in Case No. 10-CV-4572);
WHEREAS the Mandate of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
issued on March 28, 2016 (Dkt. 701 in Case No. 10-CV-4572); and
WHEREAS the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit granted the Best Buy

13

Plaintiffs’ unopposed motion for attorneys’ fees on appeal, awarded the Best Buy Plaintiffs an

14

additional $182,843.25 in attorneys’ fees, and amended its Mandate (April 25, 2016 Order [Dkt.

15

62] in Ninth Circuit Case Nos. 13-17408, 13-17618);

16

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED THAT:

17

JUDGMENT shall be entered in favor of Plaintiffs Best Buy Co., Inc.; Best Buy

18

Purchasing LLC; Best Buy Enterprise Services, Inc.; Best Buy Stores, L.P.; Bestbuy.com, L.L.C.;

19

and Magnolia Hi-Fi, Inc., and against Defendant HannStar Display Corporation, that the Best Buy

20

Plaintiffs are entitled to recover attorneys’ fees and costs in the amount of $2,037,011.22.

21

IT IS SO ORDERED.

22
23

June 6
Dated: _______________, 2016

24

By:

______________
The Honorable Susan Illston

25
26
27
28
Case No. 3:07-MD-1827 SI
86802799.1

-2-

AMENDED [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR
ENTRY OF JUDGMENT AND [PROPOSED]
JUDGMENT