Harris et al v. Costco Wholesale Corporation et al

Filing 140

ORDER RE: PROPOSED JUDGMENT. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on 10/2/2012. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/2/2012) Modified on 10/2/2012 (ahm, COURT STAFF).

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10

Northern District of California

United States District Court

11
12
13

RUTHELLEN HARRIS, et al.,
Plaintiffs,

Case No. 10-4626 JSC
ORDER RE: PROPOSED JUDGMENT

v.

14
15
16

COSTCO WHOLESALE CORP., et al.,
Defendants.

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

The Court has been advised that Plaintiffs and Defendant Warehouse Demo Services, Inc.
have conditionally resolved their claims and that the October 29, 2012 trial date should be vacated.
The Court is also in receipt of a proposed judgment from Defendant Costco Wholesale Corporation
(“Costco”) addressing Plaintiffs’ claims against Costco. The Court notes, however, that Costco also
had a cross-claim against Warehouse Demo Services, Inc. upon which it was granted summary
judgment (Dkt. No. 105) and that claims against other defendants were dismissed on July 11, 2011
(Dkt. No. 72) and then these defendants were omitted from the Amended Complaint filed July 19,
2011 (Dkt. No. 74).

26
The Court intends to issue a single judgment which encompasses all claims not resolved by
27
28

stipulation. Accordingly, defendant Costco is ordered to meet and confer with all parties and submit a

1

proposed judgment which addresses all the claims and parties that should be included in the judgment.

2

The Court will file the judgment upon the expiration of the 30-day conditional dismissal filed October

3

1, 2012, unless the case is reopened during that period.

4

IT IS SO ORDERED.

5
6

Dated: October 2, 2012
_________________________________
JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

7
8
9
10

Northern District of California

United States District Court

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2