Johnson v. County of Monterey

Filing 42

ORDER. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 4/11/12. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/11/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 ROY JOHNSON, 10 No. C 10-04633 JSW Plaintiff, For the Northern District of California United States District Court ORDER 11 12 v. COUNTY OF MONTEREY, 13 Defendant. / 14 15 On March 9, 2012, this Court issued an Order granting Defendant’s motion to dismiss 16 and granting Plaintiff leave to amend. The Court ORDERED Plaintiff to file his amended 17 complaint by no later than April 27, 2012, and it expressly advised Plaintiff that if he failed to 18 file an amended complaint by that date, the Court would dismiss with prejudice. 19 On April 9, 2012, the Court received an envelope of materials from Plaintiff. According 20 to the proof of service submitted with those materials, Plaintiff submitted a “due process brief” 21 and “various attachments.” The Court only received pages 17 and 18 of the purported brief. 22 The Court ORDERS the Clerk to file those pages and the proof of service in the public record. 23 The documents submitted as “various attachments” include some of Plaintiff’s medical 24 records. The Court HEREBY ORDERS that all of the attachments shall be filed under seal 25 pending further order of the Court. 26 Because the Court did not receive a complete copy of the “due process brief,” the Court 27 cannot construe the documents it did receive as an amended complaint. Accordingly, if 28 Plaintiff wishes the Court to consider this brief, he must submit a complete copy of that document by 1 2 April 20, 2012. Pending further order of the Court, Plaintiff still must file his amended complaint by no 3 later than April 27, 2012. Pursuant to the Court’s March 9, 2012 Order, any amendment shall 4 be limited to the allegations that the County violated Johnson’s right to procedural due process. 5 Johnson must allege facts to show that the County has a custom, policy, or practice with respect 6 to the allegations supporting the alleged violations of his due process rights. 7 Finally, the Court HEREBY ADVISES Johnson that a Handbook for Pro Se Litigants, 8 which is available through the Court’s website or in the Clerk’s office, contains helpful 9 information about proceeding without an attorney. The Court also advises Johnson that he also may wish to seek assistance from Federal Legal Assistance Self-Help program. If Johnson 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 chooses to utilize this resource, he should call 408-297-1480 to make an appointment. 12 13 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 11, 2012 JEFFREY S. WHITE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 FOR THE 3 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 ROY JOHNSON, Case Number: CV10-04633 JSW 6 Plaintiff, CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 7 v. 8 COUNTY OF MONTEREY et al, 9 Defendant. / 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. 12 District Court, Northern District of California. 13 That on April 11, 2012, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by 14 depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office. 15 16 17 Roy Johnson P.O. Box 5371 18 Corning, CA 96021 19 20 Dated: April 11, 2012 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk By: Jennifer Ottolini, Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?