Interwoven, Inc. v. Vertical Computer Systems, Inc.

Filing 281

ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 6/2/14. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/2/2014)

Download PDF
1 1 2 3 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 10 10 11 MARK V. ISOLA (SBN 154614) misola@rehonroberts.com REHON & ROBERTS, APC 830 The Alameda San Jose, CA 95126 Tel.: (408) 494-0900 Fax: (408) 494-0909 RAYMOND P. NIRO (Pro Hac Vice) VASILIOS D. DOSSAS (Pro Hac Vice) OLIVIA T. LUK (Pro Hac Vice) ASHLEY E. LAVALLEY (Pro Hac Vice) rniro@nshn.com dossas@nshn.com oluk@nshn.com alavalley@nshn.com NIRO, HALLER & NIRO 181 West Madison, Suite 4600 Chicago, IL 60602-4515 Tel.: (312) 236-0733 Fax: (312) 236-3137 Attorneys for Vertical Computer Systems, Inc. 11 12 13 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 13 15 14 16 15 17 16 18 17 19 18 20 INTERWOVEN, INC., Case No. 3:10-cv-04645-RS Plaintiff, [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE v. Hon. Richard Seeborg VERTICAL COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC., JURY TRIAL DEMANDED Defendant. 19 21 [PROPOSED] ORDER 20 22 21 23 The Stipulated Motion for Dismissal with Prejudice of all claims and counterclaims 24 22 asserted between Plaintiff Interwoven, Inc. and Defendant Vertical Computer Systems, Inc. is 25 23 GRANTED. 26 24 27 25 28 26 [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE CASE NO. 3:10-CV-04645-RS 1 It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that all claims and 2 counterclaims asserted in this suit between Plaintiff Interwoven, Inc. and Defendant Vertical 3 Computer Systems, Inc., are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 4 5 It is further ORDERED that all costs, expenses and attorneys' fees are to be borne by the party that incurred them. 6 7 SO ORDERED: 8 9 Dated: 6/2/14 ____________________________ The Honorable Richard Seeborg 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 -226 [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE CASE NO. 3:10-CV-04645-RS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?