Interwoven, Inc. v. Vertical Computer Systems, Inc.
Filing
281
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 6/2/14. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/2/2014)
1
1
2
3
4
4
5
5
6
6
7
7
8
8
9
9
10
10
11
MARK V. ISOLA (SBN 154614)
misola@rehonroberts.com
REHON & ROBERTS, APC
830 The Alameda
San Jose, CA 95126
Tel.: (408) 494-0900
Fax: (408) 494-0909
RAYMOND P. NIRO (Pro Hac Vice)
VASILIOS D. DOSSAS (Pro Hac Vice)
OLIVIA T. LUK (Pro Hac Vice)
ASHLEY E. LAVALLEY (Pro Hac Vice)
rniro@nshn.com
dossas@nshn.com
oluk@nshn.com
alavalley@nshn.com
NIRO, HALLER & NIRO
181 West Madison, Suite 4600
Chicago, IL 60602-4515
Tel.: (312) 236-0733
Fax: (312) 236-3137
Attorneys for Vertical Computer Systems, Inc.
11
12
13
12
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
14
13
15
14
16
15
17
16
18
17
19
18
20
INTERWOVEN, INC.,
Case No. 3:10-cv-04645-RS
Plaintiff,
[PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL
WITH PREJUDICE
v.
Hon. Richard Seeborg
VERTICAL COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC.,
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
Defendant.
19
21
[PROPOSED] ORDER
20
22
21
23
The Stipulated Motion for Dismissal with Prejudice of all claims and counterclaims
24
22
asserted between Plaintiff Interwoven, Inc. and Defendant Vertical Computer Systems, Inc. is
25
23
GRANTED.
26
24
27
25
28
26
[PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
CASE NO. 3:10-CV-04645-RS
1
It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that all claims and
2
counterclaims asserted in this suit between Plaintiff Interwoven, Inc. and Defendant Vertical
3
Computer Systems, Inc., are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
4
5
It is further ORDERED that all costs, expenses and attorneys' fees are to be borne by the
party that incurred them.
6
7
SO ORDERED:
8
9
Dated: 6/2/14
____________________________
The Honorable Richard Seeborg
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
-226
[PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
CASE NO. 3:10-CV-04645-RS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?