Interwoven, Inc. v. Vertical Computer Systems, Inc.

Filing 68

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONSOLIDATE CASES AND VACATE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 8/5/11. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/5/2011)

Download PDF
*E-Filed 8/5/11* 1 2 3 4 5 REHON & ROBERTS, APC Mark V. Isola (SBN 154614) misola@rehonroberts.com 830 The Alameda San Jose, CA 95126 Phone: (408) 494-0900 Fax: (408) 494-0909 8 NIRO, HALLER & NIRO Vasilios D. Dossas (Pro Hac Vice) dossas@nshn.com 181 West Madison, Suite 4600 Chicago, IL 60602-4515 Phone: (312) 236-0733 Fax: (312) 236-3137 9 Attorneys for Defendant Vertical Computer Systems, Inc. 6 7 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 INTERWOVEN INC., Case No. 3:10-cv-4645-RS [4:11-cv-2425-RS] 12 Plaintiff, STIPULATION TO CONSOLIDATE CASES AND VACATE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER 13 v. 14 VERTICAL COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC., 15 Defendant. 16 Defendant, Vertical Computer Systems, Inc. ("Vertical") and Plaintiff, Interwoven Inc. 17 ("Interwoven") respectfully request that the Court consolidate the second action entitled, Vertical 18 Computer Systems, Inc. v. Interwoven Inc., Case No. 4:11-cv-2425-RS (U.S. District Court for 19 the Northern District of San Francisco) (“second action”) into the existing action entitled, 20 Interwoven, Inc. v. Vertical Computer Systems, Inc., Case No. 3:10-cv-4645-RS (U.S. District 21 Court for the Northern District of California, San Francisco Division) (“existing action”). While 22 Defendant Interwoven Inc. opposes the request to consolidate in light of the existing action, it 23 agrees to this stipulation based on representations by Vertical that it will voluntarily dismiss the 24 second action (within three business days) when the Federal Circuit issues its order denying 25 1 26 27 STIPULATION TO CONSOLIDATE CASES AND VACATE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 Vertical’s writ of mandamus in the existing action in an effort to reduce the burdens on this 2 Court.1 Conversely, Vertical represents that when the Federal Circuit issues its order granting 3 Vertical’s writ of mandamus in the existing action, it will transfer the second action back to the 4 Texas court in which it was commenced, and seek to have the existing action dismissed.2 5 These two actions present essentially the same issues, the second action being the 6 transferred Vertical action which Vertical initiated in Texas and the existing action being the 7 declaratory judgment action that Interwoven initiated. 8 9 Vertical and Interwoven further request that the Court vacate the Case Management Conference set for August 11, 2011, in the second action as they have already completed these 10 matters in the existing action. 11 Dated: August 4, 2011 12 18 /s/ Bijal V. Vakil Noah A. Brumfield (nbrumfield@whitecase.com) Shamita D. Etienne-Cummings (setienne@whitecase.com) Bijal V. Vakil (bvakil@whitecase.com) WHITE & CASE LLP 5 Palo Alto Square, 9th Floor 3000 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA 94306 Tel: (650) 213-0300 Fax: (650) 213-8158 19 Attorneys for Plaintiff, Interwoven, Inc. 13 14 15 16 17 /s/ Mark V. Isola REHON & ROBERTS, APC Mark V. Isola (SBN 154614) misola@rehonroberts.com 830 The Alameda San Jose, CA 95126 Phone: (408) 494-0900 Fax: (408) 494-0909 NIRO, HALLER & NIRO Vasilios D. Dossas (Pro Hac Vice) dossas@nshn.com 181 West Madison, Suite 4600 Chicago, IL 60602-4515 Phone: (312) 236-0733 Fax: (312) 236-3137 20 Attorneys for Defendant Vertical Computer Systems, Inc. 21 22 23 1 Interwoven’s counsel has repeatedly unsuccessfully attempted in good faith through correspondence and telephone discussions to obtain a withdrawal of the second action. Unfortunately, Vertical’s counsel refuses to consent to the same. 2 24 Vertical cannot agree to dismiss the second action because it is necessary to the appeal to the Federal Circuit and matters related thereto. 25 2 26 27 STIPULATION TO CONSOLIDATE CASES AND VACATE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 ORDER 2 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 3 5 DATED: August __, 2011 _______________________________ HONORABLE RICHARD SEEBORG United States District Court 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 3 26 27 STIPULATION TO CONSOLIDATE CASES AND VACATE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?