Walker v. County of Santa Clara et al

Filing 100

NOTICE OF REFERENCE ORDER DENYING re 97 MOTION to Compel Plaintiff Kai Ihnken, M.D. to Respond to Request for Production of Documents filed by Dolly Goel AND ORDER TO MEET AND CONFER AND FILE JOINT LETTER. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that lead trial counsel for both parties shall meet and confer in person in Courtroom G no later than July 13, 2012. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 6/28/12. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/28/2012)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

THRESSA WALKER, ET AL.,

8
9

Plaintiff(s),
v.

NOTICE OF REFERENCE; ORDER
DENYING MOTION TO COMPEL;
ORDER TO MEET AND CONFER AND
FILE JOINT LETTER

COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, ET AL,

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

No. C 10-04668 RS (JCS)

Defendant(s).
___________________________________/

12
13
14

TO ALL PARTIES AND COUNSEL OF RECORD:
The above matter has been referred to Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero for resolution of

15

the Motion to Compel Plaintiff Kai Ihnken, M.D., to Respond to Request for Production of

16

Documents (the “Motion”) [Docket No. 97], and all future discovery matters.

17

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion is DENIED for failure of counsel to adequately

18

meet and confer. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that lead trial counsel for both parties

19

shall meet and confer in person in Courtroom G no later than July 13, 2012. Counsel shall contact

20

the undersigned’s Courtroom Deputy, Karen Hom, at [phone] to arrange a date and time for

21

the meet-and-confer session.

22

In the event that counsel are unable to resolve the matters at issue in the Motion, lead trial

23

counsel shall provide a detailed Joint Letter to the Court within five (5) calendar days of their meet-

24

and-confer session. This Joint Letter, not to exceed ten (10) pages without leave of Court, shall

25

include a description of every issue in dispute and, with respect to each such issue, a detailed

26

summary of each party’s final substantive position and its final proposed compromise on each issue.

27
28

1
2
3
4
5
6

LAW AND MOTION HEARING PROCEDURES
Civil law and motion is heard on Friday mornings, at 9:30 a.m., Courtroom G, 15th Floor,
United States District Court, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, California, 94102.
In the event a future discovery dispute arises, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that before filing
any discovery motion before this Court, the parties must comply with the following:
1.

Lead trial counsel for both parties must meet and confer in person regarding the

7

matter(s) at issue. This meeting shall occur after other efforts to resolve the dispute,

8

such as telephone, e-mail, teleconference, or correspondence, have been unsuccessful.

9

Once those efforts have proved unsuccessful, any party may demand a meeting of
lead trial counsel to resolve a discovery matter. Such a meeting shall occur within ten

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

(10) calendar days of the demand. The locations of the meetings shall alternate. The

12

first meeting shall be at a location selected by counsel for Plaintiff(s). If there are any

13

future disputes, the next such meeting shall be held at a location to be determined by

14

counsel for Defendant(s), etc.

15

2.

Within five (5) calendar days of the in-person meeting between lead trial counsel

16

referred to above, the parties shall jointly file a detailed letter with the Court, not to

17

exceed ten (10) pages without leave of Court, which will include the matters that

18

remain in dispute, a detailed substantive description of each side’s position on each

19

such issue, and a description of each side’s proposed compromise on each such issue.

20

In the absence of permission from the Court, the letter may not exceed five (5) pages.

21
22
23

3.

After the Court has received the joint letter, the Court will determine what future
proceedings, if any, are necessary.

In the event that the parties continue to be unable to resolve the matters regarding the timing

24

and scope of discovery, the Court will consider what future actions are necessary. These actions

25

may include the following: (1) sanctions against a party failing to cooperate in the discovery process

26

and meet and confer in good faith, as required by this Order, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure,

27

and the Local Rules of this Court; and/or (2) requiring the Chief Executive Officers of each party to

28

attend the in-person, meet-and-confer sessions described above. The Court is not entering either of

1

these matters as an Order of the Court at this time, and fully expects counsel to meet their

2

obligations under this Order and under the Local Rules.

3
4
5
6
7
8

Regardless of whether the Court reschedules a hearing date, all opposition and reply papers
shall be timely filed according to the originally noticed hearing date, pursuant to Civil L. R. 7-3.
A party or counsel has a continuing duty to supplement the initial disclosure when required
under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(e)(1).
All filings of documents relating to motions referred to the undersigned shall list the civil
case number and the district court judge’s initials followed by the designation “(JCS)”.

9

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

ELECTRONIC FILING AND COURTESY COPIES
Please refer to Civil L. R. 5-4 and General Order No. 45 for the Northern District of
California for information relating to electronic filing procedures and requirements.

12

BEFORE NOON ON THE NEXT BUSINESS DAY FOLLOWING THE ELECTRONIC

13

FILING, THE PARTIES ARE REQUIRED TO LODGE DIRECTLY WITH CHAMBERS ONE

14

PAPER COPY OF EACH DOCUMENT, WHICH IS TO BE DESIGNATED "JCS’S CHAMBERS'

15

COPY."

16
17
18

The failure of counsel or a party to abide by this Order may result in sanctions pursuant to
Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(f).
IT IS SO ORDERED.

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Dated: June 28, 2012
JOSEPH C. SPERO
United States Magistrate Judge