Galpern v. City of Berkeley et al

Filing 10

ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE. Response due by 4/15/2011. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on 3/30/2011. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/30/2011)

Galpern v. City of Berkeley et al

Doc. 10

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 30, 2011 MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge By order filed October 18, 2010, the parties and counsel were ordered to hold, no later than January 26, 2011, a joint inspection of the premises at issue herein. (See Scheduling Order for Cases Asserting Denial Of Right to Access Under ADA.) Further, plaintiff was ordered to file a Notice of Need for Mediation no later than 45 days after the joint site inspection. (See id.) To date, plaintiff has not filed a Notice of Need for Mediation. Accordingly, plaintiff is hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE, in writing and no later than April 15, 2011, why the above-titled action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. In the event plaintiff files, by April 15, 2011, a Notice of Need for Mediation, this order will be discharged. United States District Court v. CITY OF BERKELEY, et al., Defendants / ANDREW GALPERN, Plaintiff, No. C-10-4689 MMC ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Dockets.Justia.com