Doe et al v. City and County of San Francisco et al
Filing
177
ORDER REGARDING TRIAL SCHEDULE. Signed by Judge Thelton Henderson on 3/29/12. (tehlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/29/2012)
1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
4
5
JANE DOE and ANNE RASKIN,
6
7
8
Plaintiffs,
v.
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN
FRANCISCO, et al.,
NO. C10-04700 TEH
ORDER REGARDING TRIAL
SCHEDULE
9
Defendants.
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
At the pretrial conference held on March 26, 2012, the Court announced an
12
anticipated trial schedule of 9:00 a.m. to 1:30 p.m. each day. In light of the Court’s
13
unavailability for trial on Thursday, April 12 and Friday, April 13, the Court now revises the
14
trial schedule as follows:
15
16
1. Daily Schedule
17
On Tuesday, April 3, trial will be held from 9:00 a.m. until 5:00 p.m., with two
18
fifteen-minute breaks and one hour for lunch.
19
On Wednesday, April 4, trial will be held from 9:00 a.m. until 1:30 p.m., with two
20
fifteen-minute breaks, as previously indicated.
21
On Thursday, April 5, trial will be held from 9:00 a.m. until 5:00 p.m., with two
22
fifteen-minute breaks and one hour for lunch.
23
On Friday, April 6, trial will be held from 9:00 a.m. until 1:30 p.m., with two fifteen24
minute breaks, as previously indicated.
25
Trial will be held on Monday, April 9, though the Court had previously planned to
26
hold trial only on Tuesdays through Fridays. On that day, trial will be held from 9:00 a.m.
27
until 5:00 p.m., with two fifteen-minute breaks and one hour for lunch.
28
1
On Tuesday, April 10, trial will be held from 9:00 a.m. until 5:00 p.m., with two
2 fifteen-minute breaks and one hour for lunch.
3
On Wednesday, April 11, trial will be held from 9:00 a.m. until 5:00 p.m., with two
4 fifteen-minute breaks and one hour for lunch.
5
6 2. Time Limits
7
As previously indicated, the Court will be imposing time limits on counsel. The time
8 limits shall be as follows:
Both parties shall have 45 minutes apiece for their closing arguments.
11
For the Northern District of California
Both parties shall have 30 minutes apiece for their opening arguments.
10
United States District Court
9
Plaintiffs shall have a total of 14 hours in which to present their witnesses. This means
12 that Plaintiffs’ direct examination and any re-direct examination of the 19 lay witnesses and
13 5 experts listed in Plaintiffs’ second pretrial statement shall not exceed 14 hours in total.
14 Plaintiffs’ time shall not include the time used by Defendants for cross examination.
15
Defendants shall have a total of 6 hours in which to present the 10 witnesses listed in
16 their second pretrial conference statement. As above, only Defendants’ direct examination
17 and any re-direct examination will be bound by this limitation, and the time used by Plaintiffs
18 to cross-examine these witnesses will not be included in Defendants’ allotted time.
19
20 3. Limitations On Testimony
21
In setting these limits, the Court observes that numerous witnesses listed by the parties
22 in their second pretrial conference statement are anticipated to testify as to the same points of
23 fact. The Court reminds counsel that the Court will be strictly limiting any testimony which
24 repeats facts already established, or which is cumulative of other evidence offered in the
25 case. Counsel are reminded of the Court’s discretion to limit testimony under Federal Rule of
26 Evidence 402, and should plan their examinations with this in mind.
27
28
2
1 4. Preparation For First Day Of Trial
2
In light of the extended hours scheduled on Tuesday, April 3, 2012, it is likely that
3 voir dire will be completed, and both opening arguments presented, well before the first day
4 of trial draws to a close. Therefore, Plaintiffs should be prepared to present their first
5 witnesses on that day, and should plan accordingly.
6
7
8 IT IS SO ORDERED.
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10 Dated: 3/29/12
THELTON E. HENDERSON, JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?