Doe et al v. City and County of San Francisco et al
Filing
200
ORDER FOR FURTHER DOCUMENTATION. Signed by Judge Thelton Henderson on 5/4/12. (tehlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/4/2012)
1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
4
5
JANE DOE and ANNE RASKIN,
6
7
8
Plaintiffs,
v.
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN
FRANCISCO, et al.,
NO. C10-04700 TEH
ORDER FOR FURTHER
DOCUMENTATION
9
Defendants.
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
On April 4, 2012, on the second day of the jury trial held in this case, Lawrence
12
Hecimovich, counsel for Defendants, was ordered to show cause why sanctions should not be
13
imposed for his inappropriate questioning of Plaintiff Anne Raskin during cross-examination.
14
Mr. Hecimovich was required to file any written response to this order by noon on
15
Friday, April 6, 2012. Mr. Hecimovich responded in the form of a letter, which he filed on
16
April 6, 2012. In his letter, he made reference to a case in which he engaged in a nearly
17
identical line of questioning of a plaintiff, and in which the line of questioning had been
18
allowed over opposing counsel’s objection.
19
Mr. Hecimovich provided the name of this case in his letter, albeit with some measure
20
of uncertainty: he cites the case, noting it was his only prior jury trial, as Hsu (?) v. Bank of
21
America. He provides no case number or specific date for the case, only the year, 2001.
22
Because of this lack of specificity, the Court has no means of accessing the records
23
from this case, nor of referring to, or relying on, this ruling in evaluating the presently
24
pending order to show cause.
25
The Court wishes to further examine the state court proceedings cited by Mr.
26
Hecimovich. Therefore, the Court hereby ORDERS Mr. Hecimovich to file a transcript of
27
28
1 the relevant portion of the state court proceedings in the Hsu (?) case with this Court on or
2 before Monday, May 14, 2012.
3
4 IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6 Dated: 5/4/12
7
THELTON E. HENDERSON, JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?