Doe et al v. City and County of San Francisco et al

Filing 224

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE DISMISSAL re 223 . Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 11/07/2012. (tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/8/2012)

1
2
3
4

Mary Shea Hagebols (SBN 113222)
SHEA LAW OFFICES
1814 Franklin Street, Suite 800
Oakland, CA 94612
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
E-Mail: [e-mail]

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17

Markus B. Willoughby, Esq. (SBN 197478)
WILLOUGHBY DOYLE LLP
1814 Franklin Street, Suite 800
Oakland, CA 94612
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
E-Mail: [e-mail]
DENNIS J. HERRERA, STATE BAR #139669
City Attorney
ELIZABETH SALVESON, STATE BAR #83788
Chief Labor Attorney
LAWRENCE HECIMOVICH, STATE BAR #129688
Deputy City Attorney
Office of the City Attorney
1390 Market Street, Fifth Floor
San Francisco, California 94102-5408
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendants

18

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

19
20

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
JANE DOE and ANNE RASKIN,

21
22

Case No. C 10-04700 TEH
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE
DISMISSAL

Plaintiffs,
vs.

23
24
25
26
27

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN
FRANCISCO; JANICE MADSEN, an
individual; KIM DOUGHERTY, an
individual; AUDREY HILLMAN an
individual; HEATHER GRIVES, an
individual; and DOES 1-10,
Defendants.

28
1
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE DISMISSAL

1

STIPULATION

2
3

All parties to the underlying action hereby stipulate and hereby move the Court for an order

4

dismissing the above-captioned matter with prejudice as all terms of the settlement agreement have

5

been met.

6
7
8

Respectfully submitted,
Dated: November 6, 2012

SHEA LAW OFFICES

9
10

_/s/ Mary Shea Hagebols_____________

By:

11

MARY SHEA HAGEBOLS

12
13

Dated: November 6, 2012

WILLOUGHBY DOYLE, LLP

14
15

_/s/ Markus Willoughby_____

By:

16

MARKUS WILLOUGHBY

17

Attorneys for Plaintiffs MAURA MOYLAN
and ANNE RASKIN

18
19
20
21
22

Dated: November 6, 2012

DENNIS J. HERRERA
City Attorney
ELIZABETH S. SALVESON
Chief Labor Attorney
LAWRENCE HECIMOVICH
Deputy City Attorneys

23
24

/s/ _Lawrence Hecimovich_____
LAWRENCE HECIMOVICH

By:

25
26
27
28

Attorneys for Defendants CITY AND COUNTY OF
SAN FRANCISCO; JANICE MADSEN, an individual;
KIM DOUGHERTY, an individual; HEATHER
GRIVES, an individual

2
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE DISMISSAL

1

ORDER

2

DATED:

11/07/2012

THELTON E. HENDERSON
United States District Judge erson
. Hend

8

NO

9

helton E

RT

Judge T

10

H

ER

11
12

R NIA

S
UNIT
ED

6
7

RT
U
O

5

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

FO

DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

LI

4

PURSUANT TO THE FOREGOING STIPULATION, THIS MATTER IS HEREBY

A

3

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE DISMISSAL

C