Doe et al v. City and County of San Francisco et al

Filing 32

ORDER re 31 parties' joint discovery letter. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 8/29/2011. (dmrlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/29/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 JANE DOE, 12 13 No. C-10-04700-TEH (DMR) Plaintiff(s), ORDER RE DISCOVERY LETTER [DOCKET NO. 31] v. 14 CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, 15 Defendant(s). ___________________________________/ 16 17 The court is in receipt of the parties' joint letter regarding their discovery dispute. [Docket 18 No. 31.] The parties failed to include any legal argument. By September 2, 2011, the parties shall 19 submit a joint letter setting forth their legal arguments on the dispute. The joint letter shall not 20 exceed five pages, single spaced. In addition, by September 2, 2011, Plaintiffs shall lodge, and not 21 file, a full set of the emails at issue in this matter for in camera review. Plaintiffs shall also serve a 22 set on Defendants. 28 ER R NIA FO Judge D H 27 Dated: August 29, 2011 RT 26 . Ryu onna M NO 25 ERED O ORD IT IS S LI IT IS SO ORDERED. A 24 S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O S 23 UNIT ED For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 N F D IS T IC T O R C DONNA M. RYU United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?