Doe et al v. City and County of San Francisco et al

Filing 32

ORDER re 31 parties' joint discovery letter. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 8/29/2011. (dmrlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/29/2011)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11

JANE DOE,

12
13

No. C-10-04700-TEH (DMR)
Plaintiff(s),

ORDER RE DISCOVERY LETTER
[DOCKET NO. 31]

v.

14

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO,

15

Defendant(s).
___________________________________/

16
17

The court is in receipt of the parties' joint letter regarding their discovery dispute. [Docket

18

No. 31.] The parties failed to include any legal argument. By September 2, 2011, the parties shall

19

submit a joint letter setting forth their legal arguments on the dispute. The joint letter shall not

20

exceed five pages, single spaced. In addition, by September 2, 2011, Plaintiffs shall lodge, and not

21

file, a full set of the emails at issue in this matter for in camera review. Plaintiffs shall also serve a

22

set on Defendants.

28

ER

R NIA
FO

Judge D

H

27

Dated: August 29, 2011

RT

26

. Ryu
onna M

NO

25

ERED
O ORD

IT IS S

LI

IT IS SO ORDERED.

A

24

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

RT
U
O

S

23
UNIT
ED

For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

DONNA M. RYU
United States Magistrate Judge