Doe et al v. City and County of San Francisco et al
Filing
32
ORDER re 31 parties' joint discovery letter. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 8/29/2011. (dmrlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/29/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
JANE DOE,
12
13
No. C-10-04700-TEH (DMR)
Plaintiff(s),
ORDER RE DISCOVERY LETTER
[DOCKET NO. 31]
v.
14
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO,
15
Defendant(s).
___________________________________/
16
17
The court is in receipt of the parties' joint letter regarding their discovery dispute. [Docket
18
No. 31.] The parties failed to include any legal argument. By September 2, 2011, the parties shall
19
submit a joint letter setting forth their legal arguments on the dispute. The joint letter shall not
20
exceed five pages, single spaced. In addition, by September 2, 2011, Plaintiffs shall lodge, and not
21
file, a full set of the emails at issue in this matter for in camera review. Plaintiffs shall also serve a
22
set on Defendants.
28
ER
R NIA
FO
Judge D
H
27
Dated: August 29, 2011
RT
26
. Ryu
onna M
NO
25
ERED
O ORD
IT IS S
LI
IT IS SO ORDERED.
A
24
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
S
23
UNIT
ED
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
DONNA M. RYU
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?