Lucia et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Filing 127

Order by Hon. Vince Chhabria granting 115 Motion to Relate Case 15-cv-2856-VC.(knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/17/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Matthew G. Ball (SBN: 208881) matthew.ball@klgates.com K&L GATES LLP Four Embarcadero Center, Suite 1200 San Francisco, CA 94111 Tel.: (415) 882-8200 Fax: (415) 882-8220 Irene C. Freidel (pro hac vice) irene.freidel@klgates.com David D. Christensen (pro hac vice) david.christensen@klgate.com K&L GATES LLP State Street Financial Center One Lincoln Street Boston, MA 02111-2950 Tel.: (617) 261-3100 Fax: (617) 261-3175 Attorneys for Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 14 15 KAREN LUCIA, JEFFREY LUCIA, and GAIL CAPLAN, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, 16 17 18 19 20 Plaintiffs, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. d/b/a WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE and DOES 1 through 10, Case No. 10-CV-04749-VC [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER CASES SHOULD BE RELATED The Hon. Vince Chhabria Defendants. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER CASES SHOULD BE RELATED 1 The Court, having read and considered Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.’s Administrative Motion to 2 Consider Whether Cases Should Be Related, and finding good cause therefor, orders that the case 3 captioned Goodman v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., et al., No. 3:15-cv-02856-VC (N.D. Cal.), is hereby 10-cv-4749-VC. deemed related to this case. 4 5 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 9 10 11 August 17 Dated: ________________, 2015 _____________________________________ The Honorable Vince Chhabria United States District Judge 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER CASES SHOULD BE RELATED

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?