Lucia et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Filing
127
Order by Hon. Vince Chhabria granting 115 Motion to Relate Case 15-cv-2856-VC.(knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/17/2015)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Matthew G. Ball (SBN: 208881)
matthew.ball@klgates.com
K&L GATES LLP
Four Embarcadero Center, Suite 1200
San Francisco, CA 94111
Tel.: (415) 882-8200
Fax: (415) 882-8220
Irene C. Freidel (pro hac vice)
irene.freidel@klgates.com
David D. Christensen (pro hac vice)
david.christensen@klgate.com
K&L GATES LLP
State Street Financial Center
One Lincoln Street
Boston, MA 02111-2950
Tel.: (617) 261-3100
Fax: (617) 261-3175
Attorneys for Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
14
15
KAREN LUCIA, JEFFREY LUCIA, and GAIL
CAPLAN, on behalf of themselves and others
similarly situated,
16
17
18
19
20
Plaintiffs,
v.
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. d/b/a WELLS
FARGO HOME MORTGAGE and DOES 1
through 10,
Case No. 10-CV-04749-VC
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO
CONSIDER WHETHER CASES
SHOULD BE RELATED
The Hon. Vince Chhabria
Defendants.
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION
TO CONSIDER WHETHER CASES SHOULD BE RELATED
1
The Court, having read and considered Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.’s Administrative Motion to
2
Consider Whether Cases Should Be Related, and finding good cause therefor, orders that the case
3
captioned Goodman v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., et al., No. 3:15-cv-02856-VC (N.D. Cal.), is hereby
10-cv-4749-VC.
deemed related to this case.
4
5
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
8
9
10
11
August 17
Dated: ________________, 2015
_____________________________________
The Honorable Vince Chhabria
United States District Judge
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION
TO CONSIDER WHETHER CASES SHOULD BE RELATED
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?