Yates v. Propstra et al

Filing 26

ORDER (90 day conditional dismissal). Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 3/12/14. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/12/2014)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

CRAIG YATES, an individual,

8
9

Plaintiff,
v.
DONALD L. PROPSTRA, et al.,

11
For the Northern District of California

10

United States District Court

Case No. C10-4752 EMC

ORDER
(Ninety-Day Conditional Dismissal)

Defendants.
___________________________________/

12
13
14

The parties hereto, by their counsel, having advised the Court that they have agreed to a

15

settlement of this action, and having placed the terms of the settlement with the clients’ concurrence

16

on the record,

17

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed with prejudice and that all dates are

18

hereby vacated; provided, however, that if any party hereto shall certify to this Court, with a proof of

19

service of a copy on opposing counsel, within 90 days from the date hereof, that the agreed

20

consideration for the settlement has not been delivered over, this Order shall stand vacated, and the

21

action shall be restored to the calendar to be set for trial.

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 12, 2014
_________________________
EDWARD M. CHEN
United States District Judge