IPVenture, Inc. et al v. Cellco Partnership et al

Filing 107

ORDER GRANTING AS MODIFIED 106 MOTION to Continue Defendants' Unopposed Administrative Motion Under Civil L.R. 7-11 Requesting a Continuance of the Claim Construction Tutorial and Hearing Date Due to a Scheduling Conflict. Claims Construction Hearing set for 2/22/2012 01:30 PM. Tutorial Hearing set for 2/15/2012 01:30 PM in Courtroom 11, 19th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 10/19/11. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/19/2011)

Download PDF
Case3:10-cv-04755-JSW Document106-2 Filed10/18/11 Page1 of 2 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 4 5 IPVENTURE, INC., Plaintiff, 6 9 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MODIFIED DEFENDANTS’ UNOPPOSED ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION UNDER CIVIL L.R. 7-11 REQUESTING A CONTINUANCE OF THE CLAIM CONSTRUCTION TUTORIAL AND HEARING DATE DUE TO A SCHEDULING CONFLICT v. 7 8 Case No. 3:10-cv-04755-JSW AT&T MOBILITY, LLC, NEXTEL OPERATIONS, INC. and SPRINT SPECTRUM, LP, Defendants. 10 11 12 THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Defendants AT&T Mobility LLC’s, Nextel 13 Operations, Inc.’s and Sprint Spectrum, LP’s Unopposed Administration Motion Under Civil 14 L.R. 7-11 Requesting a Continuance of the Claim Construction Tutorial and Hearing Date Due 15 to a Scheduling Conflict. Having reviewed and considered the papers submitted in support of the motion, the 16 17 Court hereby GRANTED: Due to the Court's scheduling conflicts, 18 1. The Claim Construction Tutorial shall be reset from November 2, 2011 to February 15, 2012 December 13, 2011 at 1:30 p.m. 19 20 21 2. The Claim Construction Hearing shall be reset from November 9, 2011 to February 22, 2012 December 20, 2011 at 1:30 p.m. 22 23 October 19 Dated: _________________, 2011 24 _________________________________________ Honorable Jeffrey S. White 25 26 27 28 14979709\V-1 [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 CASE NO. 3:10-cv-04755-JSW

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?