IPVenture, Inc. et al v. Cellco Partnership et al
Filing
107
ORDER GRANTING AS MODIFIED 106 MOTION to Continue Defendants' Unopposed Administrative Motion Under Civil L.R. 7-11 Requesting a Continuance of the Claim Construction Tutorial and Hearing Date Due to a Scheduling Conflict. Claims Construction Hearing set for 2/22/2012 01:30 PM. Tutorial Hearing set for 2/15/2012 01:30 PM in Courtroom 11, 19th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 10/19/11. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/19/2011)
Case3:10-cv-04755-JSW Document106-2
Filed10/18/11 Page1 of 2
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
4
5
IPVENTURE, INC.,
Plaintiff,
6
9
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MODIFIED
DEFENDANTS’ UNOPPOSED
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION UNDER
CIVIL L.R. 7-11 REQUESTING A
CONTINUANCE OF THE CLAIM
CONSTRUCTION TUTORIAL AND
HEARING DATE DUE TO A
SCHEDULING CONFLICT
v.
7
8
Case No. 3:10-cv-04755-JSW
AT&T MOBILITY, LLC, NEXTEL
OPERATIONS, INC. and SPRINT
SPECTRUM, LP,
Defendants.
10
11
12
THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Defendants AT&T Mobility LLC’s, Nextel
13
Operations, Inc.’s and Sprint Spectrum, LP’s Unopposed Administration Motion Under Civil
14
L.R. 7-11 Requesting a Continuance of the Claim Construction Tutorial and Hearing Date Due
15
to a Scheduling Conflict.
Having reviewed and considered the papers submitted in support of the motion, the
16
17
Court hereby GRANTED: Due to the Court's scheduling conflicts,
18
1.
The Claim Construction Tutorial shall be reset from November 2, 2011 to
February 15, 2012
December 13, 2011 at 1:30 p.m.
19
20
21
2.
The Claim Construction Hearing shall be reset from November 9, 2011 to
February 22, 2012
December 20, 2011 at 1:30 p.m.
22
23
October 19
Dated: _________________, 2011
24
_________________________________________
Honorable Jeffrey S. White
25
26
27
28
14979709\V-1
[PROPOSED] ORDER
1
CASE NO. 3:10-cv-04755-JSW
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?