Roe v. City and County of San Francisco et al
Filing
50
ORDER DENYING REQUEST TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE [re 49 Stipulation filed by City and County of San Francisco]. Signed by Judge William Alsup on 9/28/2011. (whasec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/28/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
9
PLAINTIFF JOHN ROE,
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
Plaintiff,
No. C 10-04768 WHA
v.
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, San
Francisco Chiefs of Police HEATHER FONG and
GEORGE GASCON, SANDRA C. JACQUEZ
FLORES, CHRISTOPHER MERINDINO, BRIAN
GINN, MARIO MOLINA, JOSEPH L. FORD,
DANIEL H. BUTLER, ELIZABETH A.
WICKMAN, KENNETH KARCH, EMJOHN V.
PASCUA, MICHAEL J. KLINKE, JOHN S.
POSUSNEY, DAVID S. PARNELL, TSENG
CHOW, AMY POLING, GEORGE DOBBERSTEIN,
CHRISTINE LASCALZO, KRISTINE CARTER,
FRANCISCO MARTINEZ, NICOLAS T. FORST,
MARK HAMMELL, SANG JUN, GREGORY A.
JENKINS, CHRISTINE LOSCALZO [SIC], BEN
HORTON, SCOTT LAU, JOHN CAGNEY, TOM
NOOLAN, and DOES 1–40,
ORDER DENYING
REQUEST TO
CONTINUE CASE
MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE
Defendants.
/
22
23
Good cause not shown, the Court DENIES the parties’ stipulation to continue the case
24
management conference for ten weeks.
25
IT IS SO ORDERED.
26
27
28
Dated: September 28, 2011.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?