Roe v. City and County of San Francisco et al

Filing 50

ORDER DENYING REQUEST TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE [re 49 Stipulation filed by City and County of San Francisco]. Signed by Judge William Alsup on 9/28/2011. (whasec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/28/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 9 PLAINTIFF JOHN ROE, 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Plaintiff, No. C 10-04768 WHA v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, San Francisco Chiefs of Police HEATHER FONG and GEORGE GASCON, SANDRA C. JACQUEZ FLORES, CHRISTOPHER MERINDINO, BRIAN GINN, MARIO MOLINA, JOSEPH L. FORD, DANIEL H. BUTLER, ELIZABETH A. WICKMAN, KENNETH KARCH, EMJOHN V. PASCUA, MICHAEL J. KLINKE, JOHN S. POSUSNEY, DAVID S. PARNELL, TSENG CHOW, AMY POLING, GEORGE DOBBERSTEIN, CHRISTINE LASCALZO, KRISTINE CARTER, FRANCISCO MARTINEZ, NICOLAS T. FORST, MARK HAMMELL, SANG JUN, GREGORY A. JENKINS, CHRISTINE LOSCALZO [SIC], BEN HORTON, SCOTT LAU, JOHN CAGNEY, TOM NOOLAN, and DOES 1–40, ORDER DENYING REQUEST TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Defendants. / 22 23 Good cause not shown, the Court DENIES the parties’ stipulation to continue the case 24 management conference for ten weeks. 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 27 28 Dated: September 28, 2011. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?