Adams v. Albertson et al

Filing 115

ORDER REGARDING MOTION PRACTICE. Signed by Judge Alsup on October 24, 2011. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/24/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 No. C 10-04787 WHA Plaintiff, For the Northern District of California United States District Court MARK LETELL ADAMS, 11 12 v. 13 14 15 16 17 18 RONALD ALBERTSON individually in his official capacity as a former San Carlos Police Sergeant, MICHAEL ANDERSON individually in his official capacity as a former San Carlos Police Officer, JUSTIN COUNCIL individually in his official capacity as a former San Carlos Police Officer, GREG ROTHAUS individually in his official capacity as a former San Carlos Police Chief, CITY OF SAN CARLOS, CITY OF SAN CARLOS POLICE DEPARTMENT, and DOES 1-100, ORDER REGARDING MOTION PRACTICE 19 Defendants. 20 / 21 A large-scale criminal trial before the undersigned judge is underway and is expected to 22 last several months. Because this trial consumes an unusual amount of time and resources, 23 motions in civil cases will be considered and heard only on a selective basis. Except for 24 discovery disputes, no motions may be filed in this action without prior written approval. A 25 party seeking approval to file a motion must file a précis that summarizes the essence of the 26 motion and explains its urgency. Any party opposing approval to file based on the précis may 27 file an opposition by noon on the second business day following the day on which the précis was 28 filed. Both the précis and the opposition must be five double-spaced pages or shorter and may 1 not contain footnotes or attachments. After considering the précis and the opposition (if any), 2 the Court will either grant or deny leave to file the motion. If leave is granted, a briefing 3 schedule and hearing date will be set. 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 7 Dated: October 24, 2011. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 8 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?