Adams v. Albertson et al

Filing 118

DISCOVERY ORDER re 117 Letter, filed by Mark Letell Adams. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 10/26/2011. (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/26/2011)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

MARK LETELL ADAMS
Plaintiff,

8
v.

No. C 10-4787 WHA (MEJ)
ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR
TELEPHONIC CONFERENCE

9
RONALD ALBERTSON, et al.,
10
Defendants.
_____________________________________/

12
For the Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11

13

The Court is in receipt of a letter from Plaintiff Mark Adams requesting a telephonic

14

conference on or before Friday, October 28, 2011, for the purpose of resolving a discovery dispute.

15

Dkt. No. 117. In his letter, Mr. Adams states that the parties met and conferred by telephone prior to

16

the filing of his letter, and that time is of the essence because the subpoenas at issue have a

17

production deadline of October 31, 2011. As the parties have not complied with the undersigned’s

18

Discovery Standing Order, which requires them to meet and confer in person and thereafter file a

19

joint letter, the request is DENIED. However, given that the dispute remains unresolved, the non-

20

parties need not comply with the production deadline of October 31, 2011. Instead, the parties shall

21

meet and confer, file a joint letter if unable to resolve the dispute, and, if the Court then denies

22

Plaintiff’s request to quash the subpoenas, the Court shall set a production deadline.

23

IT IS SO ORDERED

24
25
26
27
28

Dated: October 26, 2011
_______________________________
Maria-Elena James
Chief United States Magistrate Judge