Adams v. Albertson et al
Filing
125
ORDER RE PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTION TO DISCOVERY ORDER re 122 Order, 123 Letter filed by Mark Letell Adams. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 11/9/2011. (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/9/2011)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
MARK LETELL ADAMS
Plaintiff,
8
v.
9
No. C 10-4787 WHA (MEJ)
ORDER RE PLAINTIFF’S
OBJECTION TO 11/7/2011
DISCOVERY ORDER
RONALD ALBERTSON, et al.,
Docket No. 124
10
12
For the Northern District of California
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
Defendants.
_____________________________________/
13
The Court is in receipt of Plaintiff’s Objection to the Court’s November 7, 2011 Discovery
14
Order, in which it permitted Defendants to go forward with the deposition of Teresa Adams and
15
ordered third parties Apple, Inc., Philip Takakjian, Ph.D, Palo Alto Medical Foundation, and
16
Sequoia Hospital to comply with Defendants’ subpoenas by November 15, 2011. Dkt Nos. 122,
17
123. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A), Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72, and Civil Local
18
Rule 72-2, the proper course for Plaintiff in objecting to a discovery order from the undersigned is to
19
file a “Motion for Relief from Nondispositive Pretrial Order of Magistrate Judge” before the
20
presiding judge in this matter. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s objection shall not be considered by the
21
undersigned, and Plaintiff should submit any objections to the presiding judge, William H. Alsup.
22
IT IS SO ORDERED
23
24
25
26
27
28
Dated: November 9, 2011
_______________________________
Maria-Elena James
Chief United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?