Adams v. Albertson et al
Filing
33
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE by Judge William Alsup [denying 30 Motion to Continue]. (whasec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/29/2010)
<![CDATA[
Adams v. Albertson et al
Doc. 33
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 v. RONALD ALBERTSON, individually in his official capacity as a San Carlos Police Sergeant, MICHAEL ANDERSON, individually in his official capacity as a San Carlos Police Officer, JUSTIN COUNCIL, individually in his official capacity as a San Carlos Police Officer, EVELINA BOZEK, individually in her official capacity as Deputy District Attorney of San Mateo County, STEPHEN HALL, individually in his capacity as the Presiding Superior Court Judge of San Mateo County, LINDA NOESKE, individually in her official capacity as Deputy City Attorney of City of San Carlos, and DOES 1100, CITY OF SAN CARLOS, COUNTY OF SAN MATEO, Defendants. / IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA MARK LETELL ADAMS, Plaintiff, No. C 10-04787 WHA
United States District Court
11
For the Northern District of California
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
In the long run, it will save time to hold both the hearing on defendants' motions to dismiss and the case management conference at the same time and will take very little extra time to do so. Therefore, the motion to continue the case management conference is DENIED. The case management conference shall immediately follow the hearing. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: December 29, 2010.
WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
