Pacific Dawn LLC et al v. Locke et al

Filing 71

STIPULATION AND ORDER Regarding Award of Attorneys' Fees and Costs. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 06/25/2012. (tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/25/2012)

Download PDF
6 James P. Walsh (CA State bar No. 184620) Gwen Fanger (CA State bar No. 191161) DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP 505 Montgomery Street, Suite 800 San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415) 276-6500 Facsimile: (415) 276-6599 budwalsh@dwt.com gwenfanger@dwt.com 7 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 1 2 3 4 5 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 IGNACIA S. MORENO, Assistant Attorney General MEREDITH L. FLAX, Senior Trial Attorney (D.C. Bar No. 468016) U.S. Department of Justice Environment & Natural Resources Division Wildlife & Marine Resources Section Ben Franklin Station, P.O. Box 7369 Washington, D.C. 20044-7369 Telephone: (202) 305-0404 Facsimile: (202) 305-0275 meredith.flax@usdoj.gov Attorneys for Defendants 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 17 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 18 San Francisco Division 19 20 PACIFIC DAWN, L.L.C., et al., 21 22 23 Plaintiffs, v. JOHN BRYSON et al., 24 25 26 27 28 Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 3:10-cv-04829-TEH STIPULATION REGARDING AWARD OF ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS 1 WHEREAS on October 25, 2010, Plaintiffs Pacific Dawn, L.L.C., et al. (“Plaintiffs”), 2 initiated the above-captioned lawsuit challenging decisions made by Federal Defendants, John 3 Bryson, et al. (“Defendants”), to approve a limited access privilege program for the trawl sector 4 of the Pacific groundfish fishery; and 5 WHEREAS the Court granted summary judgment in Plaintiffs’ favor on the first and 6 second causes of action in Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint on December 22, 2011 (ECF No. 7 49), issued an order on remedy on February 21, 2012 (ECF No. 60), and issued judgment on 8 February 22, 2012 (ECF No. 61); and 9 10 11 WHEREAS on March 22, 2012, Plaintiffs filed a motion for attorneys’ fees and costs pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412, (ECF No. 62); and WHEREAS on March 26, 2012, the Court vacated Plaintiffs’ motion for attorneys’ fees 12 and costs and ordered the parties to meet and confer regarding Plaintiffs’ request for fees and 13 costs (ECF No. 66); and 14 15 16 WHEREAS on April 10, 2012, Plaintiffs provided Defendants with a revised request for attorneys’ fees and costs; and WHEREAS Plaintiffs and Defendants, by and through their authorized representatives, 17 and without any admission or final adjudication of the issues of fact or law with respect to 18 Plaintiffs’ claim for attorneys’ fees and costs, have reached a settlement of this matter that they 19 consider to be a just, fair, adequate, and equitable resolution of the disputes set forth in Plaintiffs’ 20 motion for attorneys’ fees and costs; 21 22 23 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS STIPULATED BY AND BETWEEN PLAINTIFFS AND DEFENDANTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. Defendants agree to settle Plaintiffs’ entire claim for costs and attorneys’ fees in 24 the above-captioned litigation for a total of $75,000.00. Defendants agree to pay the entire 25 amount to James P. Walsh, Davis Wright Tremaine, 505 Montgomery Street, Suite 800 26 San Francisco, California 94111 on behalf of Plaintiffs in this action. Plaintiffs agree to furnish 27 Defendants with the information necessary to effectuate this payment. Defendants agree to 28 FEE STIPULATION 1 3:10-cv-004829-TEH 1 process the fee payment within 20 days of receipt of the necessary information from Plaintiffs or 2 the approval of this Stipulation by the Court, whichever is later. 3 2. Plaintiffs agree to accept payment of $75,000.00 in full satisfaction of any and all 4 claims for attorneys’ fees and costs of litigation to which Plaintiffs may be entitled with respect 5 to the above-captioned litigation, through and including the date of this Stipulation. 6 3. The parties agree that this Stipulation was negotiated in good faith and it 7 constitutes a settlement of claims that were vigorously contested, denied, and disputed by the 8 parties. By entering into this Stipulation, the parties do not waive any claim or defense. 9 4. By entering into this Stipulation, Defendants do not waive any right to contest 10 fees claimed by Plaintiffs or Plaintiffs’ counsel, including the hourly rate, in any future litigation. 11 Further, this Stipulation as to attorneys’ fees and costs has no precedential value and shall not be 12 used as evidence in any other attorneys’ fees litigation. 13 5. Nothing in this Stipulation shall be interpreted as, or shall constitute, a 14 commitment or requirement that Defendants are obligated to pay any funds exceeding those 15 available, or take any action in contravention of the Anti-Deficiency Act, 31 U.S.C. § 1341, or 16 any other appropriations law. 17 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 18 Respectfully submitted: June 21, 2012 19 20 /s/ James P. Walsh JAMES P. WALSH DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE 21 22 Attorney for Plaintiffs 23 IGNACIA S. MORENO, Assistant Attorney General 24 25 /s/ Meredith L. Flax 26 27 28 FEE STIPULATION 2 3:10-cv-004829-TEH MEREDITH L. FLAX, Senior Trial Attorney D.C. Bar No. 468016 U.S. Department of Justice Environment & Natural Resources Division Wildlife & Marine Resources Section 1 2 3 4 Attorneys for Defendants S DISTRICT UNIT ED S PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED, ATE T 8 06/25/2012 NO 10 THELTON E. HENDERSON United States Districton E. Henderson Judge Thelt Judge RT 11 H ER LI Date 12 A 9 C RT U O 7 R NIA 6 FO 5 N F D IS T IC T O R C 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 FEE STIPULATION 3 3:10-cv-004829-TEH

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?