Pacific Dawn LLC et al v. Locke et al
Filing
71
STIPULATION AND ORDER Regarding Award of Attorneys' Fees and Costs. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 06/25/2012. (tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/25/2012)
6
James P. Walsh (CA State bar No. 184620)
Gwen Fanger (CA State bar No. 191161)
DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP
505 Montgomery Street, Suite 800
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: (415) 276-6500
Facsimile: (415) 276-6599
budwalsh@dwt.com
gwenfanger@dwt.com
7
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
1
2
3
4
5
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
IGNACIA S. MORENO, Assistant Attorney General
MEREDITH L. FLAX, Senior Trial Attorney (D.C. Bar No. 468016)
U.S. Department of Justice
Environment & Natural Resources Division
Wildlife & Marine Resources Section
Ben Franklin Station, P.O. Box 7369
Washington, D.C. 20044-7369
Telephone: (202) 305-0404
Facsimile: (202) 305-0275
meredith.flax@usdoj.gov
Attorneys for Defendants
16
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
17
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
18
San Francisco Division
19
20
PACIFIC DAWN, L.L.C., et al.,
21
22
23
Plaintiffs,
v.
JOHN BRYSON et al.,
24
25
26
27
28
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
3:10-cv-04829-TEH
STIPULATION REGARDING AWARD
OF ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS
1
WHEREAS on October 25, 2010, Plaintiffs Pacific Dawn, L.L.C., et al. (“Plaintiffs”),
2
initiated the above-captioned lawsuit challenging decisions made by Federal Defendants, John
3
Bryson, et al. (“Defendants”), to approve a limited access privilege program for the trawl sector
4
of the Pacific groundfish fishery; and
5
WHEREAS the Court granted summary judgment in Plaintiffs’ favor on the first and
6
second causes of action in Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint on December 22, 2011 (ECF No.
7
49), issued an order on remedy on February 21, 2012 (ECF No. 60), and issued judgment on
8
February 22, 2012 (ECF No. 61); and
9
10
11
WHEREAS on March 22, 2012, Plaintiffs filed a motion for attorneys’ fees and costs
pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412, (ECF No. 62); and
WHEREAS on March 26, 2012, the Court vacated Plaintiffs’ motion for attorneys’ fees
12
and costs and ordered the parties to meet and confer regarding Plaintiffs’ request for fees and
13
costs (ECF No. 66); and
14
15
16
WHEREAS on April 10, 2012, Plaintiffs provided Defendants with a revised request for
attorneys’ fees and costs; and
WHEREAS Plaintiffs and Defendants, by and through their authorized representatives,
17
and without any admission or final adjudication of the issues of fact or law with respect to
18
Plaintiffs’ claim for attorneys’ fees and costs, have reached a settlement of this matter that they
19
consider to be a just, fair, adequate, and equitable resolution of the disputes set forth in Plaintiffs’
20
motion for attorneys’ fees and costs;
21
22
23
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS STIPULATED BY AND BETWEEN PLAINTIFFS AND
DEFENDANTS AS FOLLOWS:
1.
Defendants agree to settle Plaintiffs’ entire claim for costs and attorneys’ fees in
24
the above-captioned litigation for a total of $75,000.00. Defendants agree to pay the entire
25
amount to James P. Walsh, Davis Wright Tremaine, 505 Montgomery Street, Suite 800
26
San Francisco, California 94111 on behalf of Plaintiffs in this action. Plaintiffs agree to furnish
27
Defendants with the information necessary to effectuate this payment. Defendants agree to
28
FEE STIPULATION
1
3:10-cv-004829-TEH
1
process the fee payment within 20 days of receipt of the necessary information from Plaintiffs or
2
the approval of this Stipulation by the Court, whichever is later.
3
2.
Plaintiffs agree to accept payment of $75,000.00 in full satisfaction of any and all
4
claims for attorneys’ fees and costs of litigation to which Plaintiffs may be entitled with respect
5
to the above-captioned litigation, through and including the date of this Stipulation.
6
3.
The parties agree that this Stipulation was negotiated in good faith and it
7
constitutes a settlement of claims that were vigorously contested, denied, and disputed by the
8
parties. By entering into this Stipulation, the parties do not waive any claim or defense.
9
4.
By entering into this Stipulation, Defendants do not waive any right to contest
10
fees claimed by Plaintiffs or Plaintiffs’ counsel, including the hourly rate, in any future litigation.
11
Further, this Stipulation as to attorneys’ fees and costs has no precedential value and shall not be
12
used as evidence in any other attorneys’ fees litigation.
13
5.
Nothing in this Stipulation shall be interpreted as, or shall constitute, a
14
commitment or requirement that Defendants are obligated to pay any funds exceeding those
15
available, or take any action in contravention of the Anti-Deficiency Act, 31 U.S.C. § 1341, or
16
any other appropriations law.
17
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
18
Respectfully submitted: June 21, 2012
19
20
/s/ James P. Walsh
JAMES P. WALSH
DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE
21
22
Attorney for Plaintiffs
23
IGNACIA S. MORENO, Assistant Attorney General
24
25
/s/ Meredith L. Flax
26
27
28
FEE STIPULATION
2
3:10-cv-004829-TEH
MEREDITH L. FLAX, Senior Trial Attorney
D.C. Bar No. 468016
U.S. Department of Justice
Environment & Natural Resources Division
Wildlife & Marine Resources Section
1
2
3
4
Attorneys for Defendants
S DISTRICT
UNIT
ED
S
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED, ATE
T
8
06/25/2012
NO
10
THELTON E. HENDERSON
United States Districton E. Henderson
Judge
Thelt
Judge
RT
11
H
ER
LI
Date
12
A
9
C
RT
U
O
7
R NIA
6
FO
5
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
FEE STIPULATION
3
3:10-cv-004829-TEH
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?