Robles v. Lucky Brand Dungarees, Inc.

Filing 71

ORDER CONTINUING THE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. The Case Management Conference is continued from February 10, 2012 to March 23, 2012 at 10:30 a.m. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on February 3, 2012. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/3/2012)

Download PDF
1 SEAN REIS (SBN 184004) sreis@edelson.com 2 EDELSON MCGUIRE LLP 30021 Tomas Street, Suite 300 3 Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688 4 Telephone: (949) 459-2124 Facsimile: (949) 459-2123 5 RYAN D. ANDREWS (Pro Hac Vice) 6 randrews@edelson.com EDELSON MCGUIRE, LLC 7 350 North LaSalle, Suite 1300 8 Chicago, IL 60654 Telephone: (312) 589-6370 9 Facsimile: (312) 589-6378 10 ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF 11 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 JUVENAL ROBLES and ABEL FIGUEROA, individually and on behalf of a class of 15 similarly situated individuals, 16 17 Plaintiffs, v. 18 LUCKY BRAND DUNGAREES, INC., a 19 Delaware corporation, KIRSHENBAUM 20 21 22 23 24 BOND SENECAL & PARTNERS LLC f/k/a KIRSHENBAUM BOND & PARTNERS LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, d/b/a Lime Public Relations + Promotion, and KIRSHENBAUM BOND & PARTNERS WEST LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Case No. 10-cv-04846 MMC STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING THE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Date: Time: Courtroom: February 10, 2012 10:30 a.m. 7, 19th Floor The Honorable Maxine M. Chesney Defendants. 25 26 27 28 STIP. & ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 1 Plaintiffs Juvenal Robles and Abel Figueroa (collectively “Plaintiffs”), defendant Lucky 2 Brand Dungarees, Inc. (“Lucky”), defendants Kirshenbaum Bond Senecal & Partners LLC, f/k/a 3 Kirshenbaum Bond & Partners LLC, d/b/a Lime Public Relations + Promotion and Kirshenbaum 4 Bond & Partners West LLC (collectively “Lime”), third-party defendant Merkle, Inc. (“Merkle”), 5 and fourth-party defendant RGAR Holdings, LLC f/k/a Take 5 Solutions, LLC (“RGAR”) (together 6 the “Parties”), by and through their counsel, stipulate: 7 1. Plaintiff Robles filed his Class Action Complaint on October 26, 2010, alleging 8 defendant Lucky violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, 47 U.S.C. § 227, by sending an 9 allegedly unsolicited text message to plaintiff's cellular telephone in the summer of 2008. (Dkt. 1.) 10 2. Lucky answered the complaint, alleging, among other things, various defenses that 11 included issues involving consent, authorization, and other elements of plaintiff’s statutory claim. 12 (Dkt. 15.) 13 3. On January 21, 2011, Judge Fogel held an initial case scheduling conference and 14 ordered the parties to participate in a settlement conference before Magistrate Judge Lloyd and to 15 return and report on the result of that conference. (Dkt. 18.) 16 4. Plaintiff Robles and defendant Lucky participated in a settlement conference before 17 Judge Lloyd on April 29, 2011. Lime, Merkle and RGAR, who were all third parties at the time, 18 also participated in the settlement conference. At the settlement conference, plaintiff Robles, 19 defendant Lucky, the third parties, and insurers candidly discussed their various positions about the 20 litigation and settlement. During these discussions, it was determined that limited focused 21 discovery or information was required to continue productive discussions toward resolution. Upon 22 the recommendation of Judge Lloyd, plaintiff Robles, defendant Lucky, the third parties, and 23 insurers agreed to return for a further settlement conference. (See Dkt. 32.) 24 5. Prior to the further settlement conference, plaintiff Robles filed an Amended 25 Complaint. (Dkt. 39.) The Amended Complaint alleges a single claim for violation of the TCPA, 26 under the same general allegations stated in the original complaint, on behalf of both Juvenal 27 Robles and Abel Figueroa. The Amended Complaint also adds Lime as a named defendant. 28 -1STIP. & ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 1 6. Lime and Lucky answered the Amended Complaint. (Dkts. 45 & 48.) Lime also 2 filed a Third-Party Complaint against Merkle. (Dkt. 44). Merkle answered the third-party 3 complaint and filed a fourth-party complaint against RGAR. (Dkts. 64 & 66.) 4 7. The Parties participated in a further settlement conference before Judge Lloyd on 5 September 21, 2011. The Parties were able to advance their settlement discussion during the second 6 settlement conference, but did not reach a final agreement. The Parties agreed to continue those 7 discussions in the context of a full days mediation and, in the interim, to limit activity in the case to 8 only discovery necessary to complete mediation. The Parties thereafter scheduled a full day 9 mediation before the Honorable Nicholas H. Politan (Ret.) in West Palm Beach, Florida and set the 10 mediation for December 8, 2011. 11 8. On September 27, 2011, this matter was reassigned to this Court. (Dkt. 60.) By 12 order dated September 30, 2011, the Court set a Case Management Conference for January 20, 13 2012. 14 9. Due to medical concerns involving a member of his family, Judge Politan was forced 15 to cancel the December 8th mediation, which was reset for January 26, 2012. 16 10. Because of the rescheduled mediation, the Parties jointly requested that this Court 17 reschedule the January 20, 2012 Case Management Conference to February 10, 2012 so that the 18 mediation could be completed. 19 11. On January 26, 2012, the Parties participated in a full day mediation with Judge 20 Politan where the terms of a global settlement were negotiated. At the conclusion of the mediation, 21 and at the recommendation of Judge Politan, the Parties agreed to continue their negotiations with 22 the assistance of the Judge for an additional thirty (30) days. The Parties therefore request one final 23 continuance of the Case Management Conference, until March 23, 2012, or a date thereafter 24 convenient to the Court. 25 26 27 28 -2STIP. & ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 1 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 2 Dated: February 2, 2012 3 SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP 4 By 5 6 7 8 Dated: February 2, 2012 EDELSON MCGUIRE LLC 9 10 By 11 12 13 /s/ Brian R. Blackman CRAIG CARDON BRIAN R. BLACKMAN Attorneys for Defendant LUCKY BRAND DUNGAREES, INC. /s/ Ryan D. Andrews RYAN D. ANDREWS SEAN REIS Attorneys for Plaintiffs JUVENAL ROBLES and ABEL FIGUEROA Dated: February 2, 2012 14 WILSON ELSER MOSKOWITZ EDELMAN & DICKER LLP 15 16 By 17 18 19 20 Dated: February 2, 2012 21 /s/ Sara J. Savage DAVID SHEIFFER SARA J. SAVAGE Attorneys for Defendants KIRSHENBAUM BOND SENECAL & PARTNERS LLC and KIRSHENBAUM BOND & PARTNERS WEST LLC LATHAM & WATKINS LLP 22 23 By /s/ Peter Winik PETER WINIK MATTHEW RAWLINSON SARAH GRAGERT Attorneys for Third-Party Defendant MERKLE, INC. 24 25 26 27 28 -3- STIP. & ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 1 Dated: February 2, 2012 2 MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY, LLP 3 4 5 By /s/ Daniel E. Alberti DANIEL E. ALBERTI Attorney for Fourth-Party Defendant RGAR HOLDINGS, LLC 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -4STIP. & ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE CERTIFICATION 1 2 I, Ryan D. Andrews, am the ECF User whose identification and password are being used to 3 file this Subsequent Case Management Statement; Stipulation And [Proposed] Order Continuing 4 The Case Management Conference. In compliance with General Order 45.X.B., I hereby attest that 5 the Counsel whose electronic signatures appear on this document have concurred in this filing. 6 Dated: February 12, 2012 7 EDELSON MCGUIRE LLC 8 9 10 By /s/ Ryan D. Andrews RYAN D. ANDREWS Attorneys for Plaintiffs JUVENAL ROBLES and ABEL FIGUEROA 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -1STIP. & ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE ORDER 1 2 Having considered the parties’ stipulation and good cause appearing, the Court continues the 3 February 10, 2012 Case Scheduling Conference to March 23, 2012 at 10:30 AM in Courtroom 7, 4 19th Floor. 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 3 6 Dated: February ___, 2012 7 ______________________________ The Honorable Maxine M. Chesney United States District Judge 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -1- STIP. & ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?