Valiavacharska v. Celaya et al
Filing
38
ORDER Re: Plaintiff's Motion to Quash. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on 9/6/2011. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/6/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
ZHIVKA VALIAVACHARSKA,
Plaintiff,
12
13
14
15
No. C10-4847 JSC
ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
TO QUASH (Dkt. No. 35)
v.
MITCH CELAYA, MARGOT BENNETT,
Defendants.
/
16
17
18
On August 4, 2011, Plaintiff filed a motion to quash a subpoena served by Defendants
on Plaintiff’s mental health provider seeking certain medical and psychiatric records
19
20
pertaining to Plaintiff. (Dkt. No. 35.) Under Local Rule 7-3(a), Defendants’ response was
21
due by August 18, 2011, and Plaintiff’s reply was due by August 25, 2011. A hearing on the
22
motion was set for September 8, 2011. Defendants, after missing this deadline by weeks,
23
orally advised the Court that a notice of non-opposition to the motion to quash was
24
25
forthcoming. Despite both this pronouncement and their disregard of L.R. 7-3 (a),
26
Defendants filed a response in opposition to Plaintiff’s motion on September 2, 2011.
27
In order to give Plaintiff the opportunity to respond to Defendants’ untimely
28
opposition, Plaintiff’s reply, if any, shall be filed by September 16, 2011, and the hearing
1
2
scheduled for September 8, 2011 is continued to September 22, 2011 at 9:00 a.m. in
Courtroom F.
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6
7
8
Dated: September 6, 2011
JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?