Valiavacharska v. Celaya et al
Filing
48
ORDER RE: PLAINTIFFS DEPOSITION AND MEDICAL EXAMINATION (Dkt. Nos. 45, 47). Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on 10/26/2011. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/26/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
ZHIVKA VALIAVACHARSKA,
Plaintiff,
12
13
14
No. C10-4847 JSC
ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF’S
DEPOSITION AND MEDICAL
EXAMINATION (Dkt. Nos. 45, 47)
v.
MITCH CELAYA, ET AL.,
Defendants.
15
/
16
17
18
On October 25, 2011, the Court directed Plaintiff to be prepared to appear for a
deposition and medical examination on October 27, 2011 beginning at 9:00 am. (Dkt. No.
19
20
46.) Plaintiff was ordered to file a response, if any, by close of business on October 25,
21
2011. Plaintiff failed to meet this deadline but filed a response on October 26, 2011. Plaintiff
22
concedes that she agreed to continue her deposition “in relation to the documents that she
23
produced afterward.” (Dkt. No. 47.) Accordingly, Plaintiff is directed to appear on October
24
25
27, 2011 for her continued deposition at 9:00 am unless the parties agree to a different date
26
certain.
27
Plaintiff contests her examination by an independent medical examiner (“IME”). The
28
Court encourages the parties to resolve this issue among themselves as Plaintiff could avoid
1
2
multiple trips to California by combining her deposition with an examination by an IME. If
the parties are not able to reach a resolution, the Court will address this issue at the status
3
4
conference on November 17, 2011, and, if the Court rules that an IME is appropriate,
5
Plaintiff may have to schedule another trip to California for this purpose.
6
7
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: October 26, 2011
JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?