Valiavacharska v. Celaya et al
Filing
58
ORDER RE: NOVEMBER 17 HEARING. Further Case Management Conference reset for 11/17/2011 09:00 AM in Courtroom F, 15th Floor, San Francisco before Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on 11/7/2011. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/7/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
ZHIVKA VALIAVACHARSKA,
Plaintiff,
12
13
14
No. C 10-4847 JSC
ORDER RE: NOVEMBER 17
HEARING
v.
MITCH CELAYA, MARGOT BENNETT,
Defendants.
15
/
16
17
The Court is in receipt of Plaintiff’s letter dated November 4, 2011.
18
As a preliminary matter, the Court hereby moves the case management conference
19
(“CMC”) scheduled for 1:30 p.m. on November 17, 2011 to 9:00 a.m. that morning, to
20
immediately follow the hearing on Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff’s
21
November 4 letter refers to a November 11 CMC, but there is no such CMC currently
22
23
24
scheduled.
As the Court stated in its Order of October 26, 2011, it will address the question of
Plaintiff’s independent medical exam at the November 17 CMC. The Court will address the
25
issues raised in Plaintiff’s November 5 letter at the same time. On or before November 11,
26
27
28
2011, the parties should file any additional documents or information they wish the Court to
consider in connection with those issues.
In addition, the parties’ joint CMC statement should clearly set forth each party’s
1
2
position with respect to the pending discovery issues.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
3
4
5
Dated: November 7, 2011
JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
6
7
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?