McHale v. Silicon Valley Law Group

Filing 104

ORDER GRANTING re 99 STIPULATION To Extend Deadline to File Objections to Exhibits and Designations from 12/19/12 to 1/15/13 to Further Modify the Case Management and Pretrial Order Schedule filed by Gerard A McHale, Jr. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 11/30/12. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/3/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 MICHAEL S. DEVORKIN (pro hac vice) JACQUELINE G. VEIT (pro hac vice) GOLENBOCK EISEMAN ASSOR BELL & PESKOE LLP 437 Madison Avenue New York, New York 10022 Telephone: (212) 907-7300 Facsimile: (212) 754-0330 Email: mdevorkin@golenbock.com Email: jveit@golenbock.com 6 7 8 Attorneys for the Plaintiff, Gerard A. McHale, Jr., P.A., Liquidation Trustee 12 JEROME N. LERCH (CSB #48194) DEBRA STEEL STURMER (CSB #105276) LERCH STURMER LLP 333 Bush Street, Ste. 2020 San Francisco, California 94104 Telephone: (415) 217-6340 Facsimile: (415) 217-2782 Email: jlerch@lerchsturmer.com Email: dsturmer@lerchsturmer.com 13 Attorneys for Defendant Silicon Valley Law Group 9 10 11 14 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - 16 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 17 18 19 GERARD A. MCHALE, Jr., P.A., as Liquidation Trustee for the 1031 Debtors Liquidation Trust, 20 Plaintiff, 21 22 23 24 CASE NO. CV10-4864 (JCS) STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO FURTHER MODIFY THE CASE MANAGEMENT AND PRETRIAL ORDER, DATED SEPTEMBER 5, 2012 v. SILICON VALLEY LAW GROUP, a California Law Corporation, Defendant. 25 26 WHEREAS, the final Pretrial Conference is scheduled for March 15, 2013; and 27 28 1 1657161.1 1 2 3 WHEREAS, the Court’s Order entered September 5, 2012 (“Order”), required the parties to file objections to: (i) exhibits not less than ten days before the Pretrial Conference (March 5, 2013) (Order § III(B)), and (ii) designations at least ten calendar days before the Pretrial 4 Conference (March 5, 2013) (Order § III(T)(3)); and 5 6 7 8 WHEREAS, pursuant to a stipulation to modify the Order, entered into between the parties on September 25, 2012 and so ordered by the Court on September 26, 2012, the parties agreed to shorten the deadlines to file objections to exhibits and designations to December 19, 9 10 2012; and 11 12 WHEREAS, Parties’ Oppositions to Other Side’s Motions In Limine and Defendant’s motion for partial summary judgment are due on December 19, 2012, (See September 13 25, 2012 and November 16, 2012 orders); and 14 15 16 WHEREAS, a hearing on in limine motions, disputed items of testimony and exhibits, is scheduled for January 25, 2013; and 17 18 19 20 WHEREAS, given the upcoming holidays and the deadlines for the opposition papers to the pending motions, the parties agree that they will not have sufficient time to complete and file their respective objections to exhibits and designations by the revised earlier December 19, 21 2012, deadline, and agree to extend that deadline but still leave sufficient time before the January 22 23 25, 2013, hearing. 24 25 The undersigned parties hereby agree to further modify the Order and extend the deadline to file objections to exhibits and designations from December 19, 2012, to January 15, 26 27 2013, which is ten days before the January 25, 2013 hearing. 28 2 1657161.1 1 DATED: November 21, 2012 GOLENBOCK EISEMAN ASSOR BELL & PESKOE LLP 2 3 By: /s/ Michael Devorkin 4 Michael S. Devorkin, Esq. (pro hac vice) Jacqueline G. Veit, Esq. (pro hac vice) Attorneys for Plaintiff Gerard A. McHale, Jr., P.A., as Liquidation Trustee for the 1031 Debtors Liquidation Trust 5 6 7 8 DATED: November 21, 2012 LERCH STURMER LLP 9 By: /s/ Debra Steel Sturmer 10 Jerome N. Lerch, Esq. Debra Steel Sturmer, Esq. Attorneys for Defendant Silicon Valley Law Group 11 12 13 IT IS SO ORDERED. __________________________ pero ph C. S HON. JOSEPHseC.SPERO Judge Jo 16 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 1657161.1 A H ER LI RT Dated: 11/30/12 FO NO 17 R NIA UNIT ED 15 S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O S 14 N F D IS T IC T O R C

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?