McHale v. Silicon Valley Law Group
Filing
104
ORDER GRANTING re 99 STIPULATION To Extend Deadline to File Objections to Exhibits and Designations from 12/19/12 to 1/15/13 to Further Modify the Case Management and Pretrial Order Schedule filed by Gerard A McHale, Jr. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 11/30/12. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/3/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
MICHAEL S. DEVORKIN (pro hac vice)
JACQUELINE G. VEIT (pro hac vice)
GOLENBOCK EISEMAN ASSOR BELL & PESKOE LLP
437 Madison Avenue
New York, New York 10022
Telephone: (212) 907-7300
Facsimile: (212) 754-0330
Email: mdevorkin@golenbock.com
Email: jveit@golenbock.com
6
7
8
Attorneys for the Plaintiff,
Gerard A. McHale, Jr., P.A., Liquidation Trustee
12
JEROME N. LERCH (CSB #48194)
DEBRA STEEL STURMER (CSB #105276)
LERCH STURMER LLP
333 Bush Street, Ste. 2020
San Francisco, California 94104
Telephone: (415) 217-6340
Facsimile: (415) 217-2782
Email: jlerch@lerchsturmer.com
Email: dsturmer@lerchsturmer.com
13
Attorneys for Defendant Silicon Valley Law Group
9
10
11
14
15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA -
16
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
17
18
19
GERARD A. MCHALE, Jr., P.A., as
Liquidation Trustee for the 1031 Debtors
Liquidation Trust,
20
Plaintiff,
21
22
23
24
CASE NO. CV10-4864 (JCS)
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER
TO FURTHER MODIFY THE CASE
MANAGEMENT AND PRETRIAL
ORDER, DATED SEPTEMBER 5, 2012
v.
SILICON VALLEY LAW GROUP, a
California Law Corporation,
Defendant.
25
26
WHEREAS, the final Pretrial Conference is scheduled for March 15, 2013; and
27
28
1
1657161.1
1
2
3
WHEREAS, the Court’s Order entered September 5, 2012 (“Order”), required the
parties to file objections to: (i) exhibits not less than ten days before the Pretrial Conference (March
5, 2013) (Order § III(B)), and (ii) designations at least ten calendar days before the Pretrial
4
Conference (March 5, 2013) (Order § III(T)(3)); and
5
6
7
8
WHEREAS, pursuant to a stipulation to modify the Order, entered into between the
parties on September 25, 2012 and so ordered by the Court on September 26, 2012, the parties
agreed to shorten the deadlines to file objections to exhibits and designations to December 19,
9
10
2012; and
11
12
WHEREAS, Parties’ Oppositions to Other Side’s Motions In Limine and
Defendant’s motion for partial summary judgment are due on December 19, 2012, (See September
13
25, 2012 and November 16, 2012 orders); and
14
15
16
WHEREAS, a hearing on in limine motions, disputed items of testimony and
exhibits, is scheduled for January 25, 2013; and
17
18
19
20
WHEREAS, given the upcoming holidays and the deadlines for the opposition
papers to the pending motions, the parties agree that they will not have sufficient time to complete
and file their respective objections to exhibits and designations by the revised earlier December 19,
21
2012, deadline, and agree to extend that deadline but still leave sufficient time before the January
22
23
25, 2013, hearing.
24
25
The undersigned parties hereby agree to further modify the Order and extend the
deadline to file objections to exhibits and designations from December 19, 2012, to January 15,
26
27
2013, which is ten days before the January 25, 2013 hearing.
28
2
1657161.1
1
DATED: November 21, 2012
GOLENBOCK EISEMAN ASSOR
BELL & PESKOE LLP
2
3
By: /s/ Michael Devorkin
4
Michael S. Devorkin, Esq. (pro hac vice)
Jacqueline G. Veit, Esq. (pro hac vice)
Attorneys for Plaintiff Gerard A. McHale, Jr.,
P.A., as Liquidation Trustee for the 1031
Debtors Liquidation Trust
5
6
7
8
DATED: November 21, 2012
LERCH STURMER LLP
9
By: /s/ Debra Steel Sturmer
10
Jerome N. Lerch, Esq.
Debra Steel Sturmer, Esq.
Attorneys for Defendant Silicon Valley Law
Group
11
12
13
IT IS SO ORDERED.
__________________________
pero
ph C. S
HON. JOSEPHseC.SPERO
Judge Jo
16
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
1657161.1
A
H
ER
LI
RT
Dated: 11/30/12
FO
NO
17
R NIA
UNIT
ED
15
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
S
14
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?