Federal Trade Commission v. Wellness Support Network, Inc. et al
Filing
33
ORDER GRANTING 32 Joint Stipulation to Revise Schedule filed by Federal Trade Commission 30 MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Complaint. Responses due by 6/29/2011. Replies due by 7/6/2011. Joint cmc statement due 9/9/11. Initial CMC set for 9/16/11 at 9:30 AM. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 6/15/2011. (klh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/16/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
WILLARD K. TOM
General Counsel
LAURA FREMONT, Bar No. 159670
KENNETH H. ABBE, Bar No. 172416
Federal Trade Commission
901 Market Street, Suite 570
San Francisco, CA 94103
Phone: 415-848-5100
Fax: 415-848-5184
lfremont@ftc.gov
kabbe@ftc.gov
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Federal Trade Commission
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
San Francisco Division
10
11
12
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION,
13
Plaintiff,
Case No. 3:10-cv-4879 JCS
14
v.
15
WELLNESS SUPPORT NETWORK,
INC., a corporation,
16
17
18
ROBERT HELD, individually and as
an officer of Wellness Support
Network, Inc., and
20
JOINT STIPULATION TO
REVISE SCHEDULE
ROBYN HELD, individually and as
an officer of Wellness Support
Network, Inc.,
21
Hearing Date: TBD
Courtroom A, 15th Floor
Defendants.
19
22
23
I.
INTRODUCTION AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On May 16, 2011, pursuant to a stipulation by the parties to revise the
24
schedule for this matter (Dkt #28), the Court entered an order (Dkt #29)
25
extending by 20 days the deadline for Defendants’ responsive pleadings to
26
Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint. The Court’s order also extended by 20
27
days the deadlines for the parties to, among other things, meet and confer re
28
initial disclosures, file a Rule 26(f) report, complete initial disclosures, and file a
S T IP U LA T IO N
TO
R EVISE S CH EDU LE
3:10- C V -4879 JCS
1
Case Management Statement. In the parties’ stipulation, the parties had
2
requested revision of the schedule due to scheduling conflicts and a desire to
3
perform the tasks required by the Order Setting Initial Case Management
4
Conference (Dkt. #3) more accurately and efficiently.
On June 8, 2011, Defendants filed their Notice of Motion and Motion to
5
6
Dismiss First Amended Complaint (Dkt. #30) (“Motion to Dismiss”). The
7
hearing date was set for July 22, 2011. Pursuant to newly revised L.R. 7-3(a)
8
and L.R. 7-3(c), the deadline for Plaintiff’s opposition to the Motion to Dismiss
9
would be June 22, 2011, and the deadline for Defendants’ reply would be June
10
29, 2011.
In addition, on June 13, 2011, the Court, via a Clerk’s Notice (Dkt. #31),
11
12
extended the date for the hearing on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss from July
13
22, 2011 to September 16, 2011. The Court also extended the date of the case
14
management conference to September 16, 2011, and ordered that the case
15
management conference statement be filed by September 9, 2011. The Court
16
reiterated the June 22 and June 29 dates for filing of Plaintiff’s opposition to the
17
Motion to Dismiss and any reply by Defendants.
Due to scheduling conflicts, and pursuant to L.R. 6-2 and L.R. 7-12, the
18
19
parties have agreed to, and respectfully request the Court to approve, an
20
extension of one week for filing of Plaintiff’s opposition to Defendants’ Motion
21
to Dismiss, and an extension of one week for filing of Defendants’ reply. In
22
addition, due to the Court’s extension of the case management conference and
23
filing of the case management statement, the parties respectfully request that the
24
associated deadlines set in the Court’s May 16, 2011 Order (Dkt. #29) be
25
extended as set forth in the schedule below. The hearing date, case management
26
conference date, and case management conference statement date set by the
27
Clerk’s Notice (Dkt. #31) would not change.
28
//
S T IP U LA T IO N
TO
R EVISE S CH EDU LE
3:10- C V -4879 JCS
Page 2 of 4
1
II.
The parties propose the following modifications to the current schedule for
2
3
this case:
1.
4
5
2.
Defendants’ reply to Plaintiff’s Opposition, if any, shall be filed no
later than July 6, 2011.
3.
8
9
Plaintiff’s opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss shall be
filed no later than June 29, 2011.
6
7
PROPOSED REVISED SCHEDULE
The last day to meet and confer regarding initial disclosures, early
settlement, ADR process selection, and discovery plan shall be August 26, 2011.
10
4.
The last day to file for ADR Certification shall be August 26, 2011.
11
5.
The last day to file either a Stipulation to ADR Process or Notice of
12
Need for ADR Phone Conference shall be August 26, 2011.
6.
13
The last day to file Rule 26(f) reports, complete initial disclosures or
14
state objections in a Rule 26(f) report, and file a Case Management Statement,
15
shall be September 9, 2011.
7.
16
The Initial Case Management Conference shall be held on
17
September 16, 2011 at 9:30 a.m.
18
III.
19
20
CONCLUSION
The parties respectfully request that the Court revise the schedule as set
forth above.
Respectfully submitted,
21
22
DATED: June 15, 2011
LAURA FREMONT
KENNETH H. ABBE
Attorneys for Plaintiff
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
23
24
25
26
__/s/ Laura Fremont__________________
27
(The filer attests that concurrence in the filing of this document has been
obtained from each of the other signatories.)
28
DATED: June 15, 2011
S T IP U LA T IO N
TO
R EVISE S CH EDU LE
___/s/Mitchell S. Fuerst_______________
3:10- C V -4879 JCS
Page 3 of 4
MITCHELL S. FUERST
ANDREW S. ITTLEMAN
FUERST ITTLEMAN, PL
Attorneys for Defendants
WELLNESS SUPPORT NETWORK, Inc.,
ROBERT HELD, and ROBYN HELD
1
2
3
4
5
6
DATED: June 15, 2011
7
8
9
_____/s/ Leslie Holmes______________
LESLIE HOLMES
HOLMES & USOZ, LLP
Attorney for Defendants
WELLNESS SUPPORT NETWORK, INC.,
ROBERT HELD, and ROBYN HELD
10
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
12
UNIT
ED
S
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
pero
ph C. S
dge Jose
Ju
NO
16
RT
17
ER
H
18
19
FO
15
R NIA
______________________________________
JOSEPH C. SPERO
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
14
LI
13
DATED: 06/15/2011
A
11
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
S T IP U LA T IO N
TO
R EVISE S CH EDU LE
3:10- C V -4879 JCS
Page 4 of 4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?