ATS Products, Inc. v. Ghiorso et al

Filing 110

ORDER STAYING LITIGATION PENDING FINAL SETTLEMENT. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bernard Zimmerman on 6/9/2011. (bzsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/9/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 John V. Picone III, Bar No. 187226 jpicone@hopkinscarley.com Jennifer S. Coleman, Bar No. 213210 jcoleman@hopkinscarley.com HOPKINS & CARLEY A Law Corporation The Letitia Building 70 South First Street San Jose, CA 95113-2406 Attorneys for Defendant and Counter-Claimant FRANK GHIORSO and Defendants THERMALGUARD TECHNOLOGY, LLC; THERMALGUARD, LLC 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 12 ATS PRODUCTS, INC., 13 14 15 16 Plaintiff, v. CASE NO. CV10-04880 BZ [PROPOSED] ORDER STAYING LITIGATION PENDING FINAL SETTLEMENT FRANK GHIORSO; THERMALGUARD TECHNOLOGY, LLC; THERMALGUARD, LLC, 17 Defendants. 18 AND RELATED COUNTER-CLAIMS. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 H OPKINS & C ARLEY ATTORNEYS AT LAW SAN JOSE 626\848280.1 ORDER STAYING LITIGATION PENDING FINAL SETTLEMENT CV10-04880 BZ 1 2 Upon due consideration of the Stipulation Requesting Stay of Litigation Pending Final 3 Settlement, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 60 1. The litigation is stayed for 120 days pending documentation of a settlement 4 agreement. 5 2. July 11, 2011 at 1:30 p.m. A status conference shall be held within approximately 90 days of entry of the 6 order approving this stipulation to advise the Court of the progress of the parties in documenting 7 a settlement agreement. , unless a dismissal is filed earlier. 8 Pursuant to the Stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 10 11 9 Dated: June ___, 2011 + ________________________________________ THE HONORABLE BERNARD ZIMMERMAN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 H OPKINS & C ARLEY ATTORNEYS AT LAW SAN JOSE 626\848280.1 ORDER STAYING LITIGATION PENDING FINAL SETTLEMENT CV10-04880 BZ

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?