ATS Products, Inc. v. Ghiorso et al
Filing
110
ORDER STAYING LITIGATION PENDING FINAL SETTLEMENT. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bernard Zimmerman on 6/9/2011. (bzsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/9/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
John V. Picone III, Bar No. 187226
jpicone@hopkinscarley.com
Jennifer S. Coleman, Bar No. 213210
jcoleman@hopkinscarley.com
HOPKINS & CARLEY
A Law Corporation
The Letitia Building
70 South First Street
San Jose, CA 95113-2406
Attorneys for Defendant and Counter-Claimant
FRANK GHIORSO and Defendants
THERMALGUARD TECHNOLOGY, LLC;
THERMALGUARD, LLC
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
12
ATS PRODUCTS, INC.,
13
14
15
16
Plaintiff,
v.
CASE NO. CV10-04880 BZ
[PROPOSED] ORDER STAYING
LITIGATION PENDING FINAL
SETTLEMENT
FRANK GHIORSO; THERMALGUARD
TECHNOLOGY, LLC;
THERMALGUARD, LLC,
17
Defendants.
18
AND RELATED COUNTER-CLAIMS.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
H OPKINS & C ARLEY
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN JOSE
626\848280.1
ORDER STAYING LITIGATION PENDING FINAL SETTLEMENT
CV10-04880 BZ
1
2
Upon due consideration of the Stipulation Requesting Stay of Litigation Pending Final
3
Settlement, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
60
1.
The litigation is stayed for 120 days pending documentation of a settlement
4
agreement.
5
2.
July 11, 2011 at 1:30 p.m.
A status conference shall be held within approximately 90 days of entry of the
6
order approving this stipulation to advise the Court of the progress of the parties in documenting
7
a settlement agreement. , unless a dismissal is filed earlier.
8
Pursuant to the Stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED.
9
10
11
9
Dated: June ___, 2011
+
________________________________________
THE HONORABLE BERNARD ZIMMERMAN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
H OPKINS & C ARLEY
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN JOSE
626\848280.1
ORDER STAYING LITIGATION PENDING FINAL SETTLEMENT
CV10-04880 BZ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?