Electronic Frontier Foundation v. Department of Justice

Filing 70

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 69 TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE FOR PARTIES' RENEWED CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. Motion Hearing set for 5/30/2013 01:30 PM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Richard Seeborg. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 4/22/13. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/22/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Jennifer Lynch (SBN 240701) jlynch@eff.org ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION 815 Eddy Street San Francisco, CA 94109 Telephone: (415) 436-9333 Facsimile: (415) 436-9993 David L. Sobel (pro hac vice) sobel@eff.org ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION 1818 N Street, N.W., Suite 410 Washington, DC 20036 Telephone: (202) 797-9009 x104 Facsimile: (202) 707-9066 Attorneys for Plaintiff Electronic Frontier Foundation 12 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 ) ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION, ) Case No. 4:10-cv-04892-RS ) Plaintiff, ) ) STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] v. ) ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING ) DATE FOR PARTIES’ RENEWED DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, ) CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY ) JUDGMENT Defendant. ) ) [Civ. L.R. 6-2] ) ) Date: April 25, 2013 ) Time: 2:30 p.m. ) Place: Ctrm. 3, 17th Floor ) Judge: Hon. Richard Seeborg ) ) ) 26 27 28 Case No. CV-10-04892-RS STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE FOR PARTIES’ RENEWED CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 1 Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b)(1) and Civil L.R. 6-2, the parties, by and through 2 undersigned counsel, have conferred and hereby stipulate to and respectfully request the Court 3 grant a continuance to the hearing date for the parties’ Renewed Cross Motions for Summary 4 Judgment. The hearing date is currently scheduled for Thursday, April 25, 2013, and the parties 5 request the hearing be continued to Thursday, May 30, 2013. 6 The parties seek this continuance because Plaintiff’s counsel’s grandmother passed away 7 today, and plaintiff’s counsel needs to travel to be with family and to help her family with the 8 logistics surrounding her grandmother’s death. Defendant’s counsel’s schedule is full with other 9 matters throughout the month of May, and so May 30, 2013 is the first date both counsel will be 10 available. 11 This requested change will minimally affect the present schedule for the case because the 12 Renewed Cross Motions are fully briefed and because it will only extend the hearing date by about 13 a month. 14 DATED: April 19, 2013 Respectfully submitted, 15 /s/ Jennifer Lynch Jennifer Lynch ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION 815 Eddy Street San Francisco, CA 94109 Telephone: (415) 436-9333 Facsimile: (415) 436-9993 16 17 18 19 Attorneys for Plaintiff ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION 20 26 /s/ Nicholas Cartier (with permission) NICHOLAS CARTIER Trial Attorney, Federal Programs Branch Civil Division, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 20 Massachusetts Ave NW, 7224 PO Box 883 (US Mail) Washington, DC 20530 Tel: 202-616-8351 Fax: 202-616-8470 email: nicholas.cartier@usdoj.gov 27 Attorneys for Defendants 21 DATED: April 19, 2013 22 23 24 25 28 Case No. CV-10-04892-RS 1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE FOR PARTIES’ RENEWED CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 1 DECLARATION PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 5-1 2 I, Jennifer Lynch, hereby declare pursuant to Local Rule 5-1 that I have obtained 3 Defendant’s concurrence in the filing of this document from Nicholas Cartier, Counsel for 4 Defendant. 5 Executed on April 19, 2013, in San Francisco, California. 6 /s/ Jennifer Lynch Jennifer Lynch 7 8 9 * 10 * * * * * * 11 12 13 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 14 15 4/22/13 Dated: ______________ The Hon. RICHARD SEEBORG United States District Judge 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. CV-10-04892-RS 2 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE FOR PARTIES’ RENEWED CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?