Imperiale v. City of South San Francisco
Filing
15
ORDER GRANTING 14 Stipulation Seeking Referral to Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Laporte for a Settlement Conference. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 7/10/12. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/10/2012)
Case3:10-cv-04932-JSW Document14 Filed07/10/12 Page1 of 3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
TIMOTHY S. THIMESCH, ESQ., No. 148213
158 Hilltop Crescent
Walnut Creek, CA 94597-3452
Tel: 925-588-0401
Fax: 888-210-8868
Attorneys for Plaintiff PAUL IMPERIALE
MARK F. HAZELWOOD, Esq. (SBN 136521)
DIRK D. LARSEN, Esq. (SBN 246028)
LOW, BALL & LYNCH
505 Montgomery Street, 7th Floor
San Francisco, California 94111-2584
Telephone (415) 981-6630
Facsimile ( 415) 982-1634
9
Attorneys for Defendant CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO
10
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
13
14
PAUL IMPERIALE,
15
CASE NO. 3:10-cv-04932-JSW
Civil Rights
Plaintiff,
16
v.
17
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO; and
DOES 1 through 50, Inclusive,
STATUS REPORT AND STIPULATION
AND [Proposed] ORDER SEEKING
REFERRAL TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE
ELIZABETH LAPORTE FOR A
SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE
18
Defendants.
19
20
/
21
The is a disputed liability case brought under Title II of the Americans With Disabilities
22
Act, involving issues of historical fabric at the City Hall complex is South San Francisco. The
23
parties continue to cooperate in implementing General Order 56. At the time of this statement,
24
Plaintiff represents that he has provided an expert report to Defendant. The parties have also
25
conducted the required inspection/meeting with consultants and counsel. At least one of the
26
major site issues has already been resolved, and agreements appear possible on other issues.
27
In order to maintain the momentum toward settlement and to assist the parties in their
28
negotiations, the parties request referral of this matter to a judicial settlement conference before a
Stipulation and Order For Referral to Settlement Conference:
Case No. 3:10-cv-04932-JSW
Case3:10-cv-04932-JSW Document14 Filed07/10/12 Page2 of 3
1
magistrate judge. There is substantial good cause. The claims involve alleged barriers to access
2
at the City Hall Complex, which is a square block area. The parties believe that a magistrate
3
judge may be effective at dealing with the factual and legal issues, and the impasse that exists as
4
to certain injunctive relief claims. The parties suggest referral of this matter to Magistrate Judge
5
Elizabeth Laporte, whose staff has already indicated availability for a Settlement Conference on
6
////
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Stipulation and Order For Referral to Settlement Conference:
Case No. 3:10-cv-04932-JSW
—2—
Case3:10-cv-04932-JSW Document14 Filed07/10/12 Page3 of 3
1
2
July 18, 2012, i.e., subject to this Court’s approval.
SO STIPULATED.
3
4
Dated: July 10, 2012
THIMESCH LAW OFFICES
TIMOTHY S. THIMESCH
5
/s/ Authorized Signed
Attorneys for Plaintiff PAUL IMPERIALE
6
7
8
Dated: July 10, 2012
9
10
MARK F. HAZELWOOD, ESQ.
DIRK D. LARSEN, ESQ.
LOW, BALL & LYNCH
/s/ Authorized Signed
Attorneys for Defendant
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO
11
12
13
14
ORDER
15
16
SO ORDERED.
.
17
18
19
Dated: July 10, 2012
HON. JEFFREY S. WHITE
JUDGE FOR U.S. DISTRICT COURT
20
21
22
cc: Magistrate Judge Laporte, Magistrate
Referral Clerk
23
24
25
26
27
28
Stipulation and Order For Referral to Settlement Conference:
Case No. 3:10-cv-04932-JSW
—3—
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?