Session v. PLM Lender Services, Inc. et al
Filing
139
ORDER SETTING EVIDENTIARY HEARING (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/3/2013)
1
2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
3
4
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
6
7
8
BESS KENNEDY, as guardian ad litem for
LATANYA MARIE SESSION,
Plaintiff,
9
ORDER SETTING
EVIDENTIARY HEARING
v.
13
MONTEREY BAY RESOURCES, INC.,
TY EBRIGHT, ANN EBRIGHT,
CONTANZ FRIE, MATTHEW LOPEZ,
PLM LENDER SERVICES, INC., and
DOES 1-50,
14
Defendants.
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
No. C 10-04942 WHA
12
/
15
16
On January 3, 2013, Attorney Jacqueline Young, counsel for plaintiff, and Attorney
17
Samuel Goldstein, counsel for defendants Monterey Bay Resources, Inc., Ty Ebright, Ann
18
Ebright, Contanz Frie, and Matthew Lopez, appeared for the order to show cause hearing.
19
Counsel for defendant PLM Lender Services, Inc., Attorney Patrick Kelly, did not attend the
20
hearing. The order to show cause and setting the hearing ordered the parties to show cause why
21
the action should not be dismissed with prejudice due to the settlement agreement (Dkt. Nos. 135
22
and 137). According to Attorney Young, the action was not dismissed because (1) additional
23
signatures were needed from four non-parties and (2) defendants had not yet made the first
24
payments to plaintiff.
25
Attorney Young stated that defendant Ann Ebright had represented that Ebright would
26
procure all necessary signatures to the settlement agreement. As of January 3, however, Ms.
27
Ebright had not obtained the signatures of four lenders and/or owners: Andrea Villa, Kristi
28
Damico, Blasezyk Physical Therapy Retirement Plan and Trust, and the Michael Reinhold 2006
Family Trust. Additionally, defendants Monterey Bay Rources, Ty and Ann Ebright, and
1
Contanz Frie were required to make a first payment of $10,000, collectively, under the settlement
2
agreement. Defendant PLM Lender Services was required to make a first payment of $10,000.
3
To date, plaintiff has not received any payments.
4
Accordingly, the Court hereby orders that the following persons or, if not a natural person,
Andrea Villa, Kristi Damico, Blasezyk Physical Therapy Retirement Plan and Trust, and the
7
Michael Reinhold 2006 Family Trust. They should be prepared to testify under oath as to why
8
they have not signed the agreement. Based on Ms. Ebright’s representation that she would ensure
9
that the signatures were provided, Ms. Ebright is ordered to ensure that all four non-parties listed
10
above appear at the hearing and are prepared to testify on this topic. Ms. Ebright is warned that
11
For the Northern District of California
the representatives, appear on JANUARY 17, 2013, AT 2:00 P.M. FOR AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING:
6
United States District Court
5
failure to do so may result in a contempt order against her. If, however, the requisite signatures
12
are all obtained and provided to plaintiff, and Ms. Ebright files a sworn declaration to that effect
13
by NOON ON JANUARY 15, the non-parties’ attendance may be excused. Ms. Ebright is also
14
ordered to appear at the hearing to testify as to why she should not be found in contempt for
15
failing to follow through on her representation pursuant to the settlement agreement.
16
Attorneys Goldstein and Kelly are required to appear at the hearing and testify as to why
17
their clients have not made the first payments to plaintiff, as provided for by the settlement
18
agreement. If a payment is made by NOON ON JANUARY 15, and the attorney timely files a sworn
19
declaration so stating, the attorney’s appearance at the hearing may be excused.
20
Absent further Court order, all persons identified herein must attend the January 17
21
hearing. As stated above, if a sworn declaration is timely filed by NOON ON JANUARY 15
22
regarding a person’s full performance of his or her duties under the settlement agreement, that
23
person’s attendance may be excused by the Court. Attorney Goldstein is ordered to serve this
24
order on all non-parties listed above.
25
26
27
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: January 3, 2013.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?