Target Corp. et al v. AU Optronics Corporation et al

Filing 137

ORDER Notice of Motion and Motion of Samsung SDI and Sanyo Consumer Electronics to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint Stipulation (4318) (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/19/2011)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13

Jeffrey H. Howard (pro hac vice)
Jerome A. Murphy (pro hac vice)
CROWELL & MORING LLP
1001 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20004
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 202-628-5116
Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]
Jason C. Murray (CA Bar No. 169806)
Joshua C. Stokes (CA Bar No. 220214)
CROWELL & MORING LLP
515 South Flower St., 40th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90071
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 213-622-2690
Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]
Counsel for Plaintiffs Target Corporation; Sears,
Roebuck and Co.; Kmart Corporation; Old Comp
Inc.; Good Guys, Inc.; RadioShack Corporation;
and Newegg Inc.
[Additional counsel listed on signature page]

14

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

15

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

16

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

17
In re TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL) ANTITRUST
LITIGATION

Master Docket No. 07-m-1827 SI
Case No. CV:10-4945 SI

This Document Relates To:

18

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE
FOR MOTION TO DISMISS SECOND
AMENDED COMPLAINT

19
20
21

Target Corporation, et al. v. AU Optronics
Corporation, et al., Case No. CV:10-4945 SI

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
C ROWELL
& M ORING LLP
ATTO RNEY S AT LAW

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR MOTION TO
DISMISS SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

CASE NO. CV:10-4945 SI

1

Whereas defendants Samsung SDI Co. Ltd., Samsung SDI America, Inc. (“SDI”), and

2

Sanyo Consumer Electronics Co., Ltd.(“Sanyo CE”) (collectively “Defendants”) filed a Motion to

3

Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint of plaintiffs Target Corporation; Sears, Roebuck and

4

Co.; Kmart Corporation; Old Comp Inc.; Good Guys, Inc.; RadioShack Corporation; and Newegg

5

Inc. (“Plaintiffs”) on November 18, 2011 [Docket No. 4162] (the “Motion”);

6
7
8
9
10

Whereas the Motion was originally noticed for hearing on January 6, 2012, but was
continued by the Court to January 27, 2012;
Whereas the parties previously agreed, and the Court approved, a briefing schedule calling
for the opposition briefs to be filed on December 14, 2011 and the reply briefs to be filed by
December 23, 2011;

11

Whereas the parties wish to alter the current briefing schedule for the Motion;

12

Whereas the parties believe that the proposed briefing schedule will not cause any

13
14

prejudice to the Court’s schedule;
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and among the

15

undersigned counsel, on behalf of their respective clients, Plaintiffs, on the one hand, and

16

Defendants, on the other hand, that the briefing schedule for the Motion shall be as follows:

17

Oppositions to be filed by:

December 29, 2011

18

Replies to be filed by:

January 13, 2012

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
C ROWELL
& M ORING LLP
ATTO RNEY S AT LAW

-1-

CASE NO. CV:10-4945 SI

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR MOTION TO DISMISS SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

1
Dated: December 9, 2011

/s/ Nathanial J. Wood

2
3
4
5
6
7

Jason C. Murray (CA Bar No. 169806)
Joshua C. Stokes (CA Bar No. 220214)
Nathanial J. Wood (CA Bar No. 223547)
CROWELL & MORING LLP
515 South Flower St., 40th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90071
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 213-622-2690
Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

8
9
10
11
12

Jeffrey H. Howard (pro hac vice)
Jerome A. Murphy (pro hac vice)
CROWELL & MORING LLP
1001 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20004
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 202-628-5116
Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]

13
14
15
16
17
18

Kenneth L. Adams (pro hac vice)
R. Bruce Holcomb (pro hac vice)
Christopher T. Leonardo (pro hac vice)
ADAMS HOLCOMB LLP
1875 Eye Street NW
Washington, DC 20006
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 202-580-8821
Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

19
20
21

Counsel for Plaintiffs Target Corporation; Sears,
Roebuck and Co.; Kmart Corporation; Old Comp
Inc.; Good Guys, Inc.; RadioShack Corporation;
and Newegg Inc.

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
C ROWELL
& M ORING LLP
ATTO RNEY S AT LAW

-2-

CASE NO. CV:10-4945 SI

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR MOTION TO DISMISS SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

1
/s/ Michael W. Scarborough
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13

Michael W. Scarborough (SBN 203524)
Tyler Mark Cunningham (SBN 243694)
SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTER & HAMPTON
Four Embarcadero Center, 17th Floor
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Eric S. O’Connor (SBN 223244)
SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTER & HAMPTON
30 Rockefeller Plaza
New York, New York 10112-0015
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 212-653-8701
[e-mail]
Counsel for Defendants Samsung SDI America, Inc.
and Samsung SDI Co., Ltd.

14
15
16
17
18
19
20

/s/ Allison A. Davis
Allison A. Davis (CA State Bar No. 139203)
Sanjay Nangia (CA State Bar No. 264986)
DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP
505 Montgomery Street, Suite 800
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]

21
22
23
24
25
26

Nick S. Verwolf (admitted pro hac vice)
DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP
777 108th Avenue, N.E.
Bellevue, WA 98004-5149
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
Counsel for Defendant Sanyo Consumer Electronics
Co., Ltd.

27
28
C ROWELL
& M ORING LLP
ATTO RNEY S AT LAW

-3-

CASE NO. CV:10-4945 SI

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR MOTION TO DISMISS SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

1
2

Pursuant to General Order 45, Part X-B, the filer attests that concurrence in the
filing of this document has been obtained from the other signatories.

3
4

IT IS SO ORDERED.

5
6

12/16
Dated: ________________, 2011

7
8

Susan Illston, United States District Judge

9
DCACTIVE-16941312.1

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
C ROWELL
& M ORING LLP
ATTO RNEY S AT LAW

-4-

CASE NO. CV:10-4945 SI

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR MOTION TO DISMISS SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT