Target Corp. et al v. AU Optronics Corporation et al
Filing
177
ORDER by Judge Illston signed on 3/12/12granting 5071 Stipulation in case 3:07-md-01827-SI; granting 175 Stipulation in case 3:10-cv-04945-SI (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/14/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
HOLLY A. HOUSE (SB# 136045) hollyhouse@paulhastings.com
KEVIN C. McCANN (SB# 120874) kevinmccann@paulhastings.com
SEAN D. UNGER (SB# 231694) seanunger@paulhastings.com
PAUL HASTINGS LLP
55 Second Street
Twenty-Fourth Floor
San Francisco, CA 94105-3441
Telephone: (415) 856-7000
Facsimile: (415) 856-7100
LEE F. BERGER (SB# 222756) leeberger@paulhastings.com
PAUL HASTINGS LLP
875 15th Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20005
Telephone: (202) 551-1772
Facsimile: (202) 551-0172
9
10
Attorneys for Defendants
LG Display Co., Ltd. and LG Display America, Inc.
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
14
15
IN RE TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL)
ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Case No. 3:10-cv-04945 SI
16
Case No. M 07-md-01827 SI
17
MDL No. 1827
18
19
This Document Relates to Individual
Case No. 10-cv-04945 SI:
20
TARGET CORP., et al.,
21
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO MOVE
TO COMPEL AS TO CERTAIN
DISCOVERY
Plaintiff,
22
vs.
23
AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION, et al.,
24
Defendants.
25
26
27
28
Case No. 10-cv-04945 SI;
Case No. M 07-1827 SI
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
EXTENDING TIME TO MOVE TO COMPEL
AS TO CERTAIN DISCOVERY
1
Defendant LG Display Co., Ltd. and plaintiffs Target Corp., Sears, Roebuck and Co.,
2
Kmart Corp., Old Comp Inc., Good Guys, Inc., Radioshack Corp., Newegg Inc. (collectively,
3
“Target Plaintiffs”) stipulate as follows:
4
5
6
WHEREAS LG Display Co., Ltd. served a set of Requests for Admission and
Interrogatories on the Target Plaintiffs on October 31, 2011 (collectively, “Discovery”);
WHEREAS several parties, including LG Display and the Target Plaintiffs, stipulated to
7
an extension that provided until January 30, 2012 for the receiving parties to respond and until
8
March 1, 2012 for the propounding parties to move to compel;
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
WHEREAS the Target Plaintiffs served their responses and objections to the Discovery
on January 30, 2012;
WHEREAS LG Display and the Target Plaintiffs desire additional time to meet and
confer to resolve their disputes regarding the Discovery;
THEREFORE, LG Display and the Target Plaintiffs, by their respective undersigned
counsel, stipulate and agree as follows:
The deadline for LG Display to move to compel further response to the Discovery shall be
extended to March 16, 2012.
17
18
DATED: March 8, 2012
19
HOLLY A. HOUSE
KEVIN C. McCANN
LEE F. BERGER
PAUL HASTINGS LLP
20
21
By:
/s/ Lee F. Berger
Lee F. Berger
22
Attorneys for Defendants
LG Display Co., Ltd. and LG Display America, Inc.
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 10-cv-04945 SI;
Case No. M 07-1827 SI
-1-
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
EXTENDING TIME TO MOVE TO COMPEL
AS TO CERTAIN DISCOVERY
1
CROWELL & MORING LLP
2
By:
3
/s/
Jason C. Murray (CA Bar No. 169806)
Joshua C. Stokes (CA Bar No. 220214)
515 South Flower St. 40th Fl.
Los Angeles, CA 90071
(213) 443-5582 (telephone)
(213) 443-2690 (facsimile)
jmurray@crowell.com
jstokes@crowell.com
4
5
6
7
8
Jeffrey H. Howard (pro hac vice)
Jerome A. Murphy (pro hac vice)
1001 Pennsylvania Ave. NW
Washington, DC 20004
(202) 624-2500 (telephone)
(202) 628-5116 (facsimile)
jhoward@crowell.com
jmurphy@crowell.com
9
10
11
12
Kenneth L. Adams (pro hac vice)
R. Bruce Holcomb (pro hac vice)
ADAMS HOLCOMB LLP
1875 Eye St. NW
Washington, DC 20006
(202) 580-8822 (telephone)
(202) 580-8821 (facsimile)
adams@adamsholcomb.com
holcomb@ adamsholcomb.com
13
14
15
16
17
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Target Corp., Sears, Roebuck and Co., Kmart Corp.,
Old Comp Inc., Good Guys, Inc., Radioshack Corp.,
and Newegg Inc.
18
19
20
21
Attestation: The filer of this document attests that the concurrence of the signatories thereto has
22
been obtained.
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 10-cv-04945 SI;
Case No. M 07-1827 SI
-2-
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
EXTENDING TIME TO MOVE TO COMPEL
AS TO CERTAIN DISCOVERY
[PROPOSED] ORDER
1
2
3
4
Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation set forth above and pursuant to Rule 6-1(a) of the Civil
Local Rules,
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6
Dated Entered:
3/12/12
The Honorable Susan Illston
United States District Judge
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 10-cv-04945 SI;
Case No. M 07-1827 SI
-3-
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
EXTENDING TIME TO MOVE TO COMPEL
AS TO CERTAIN DISCOVERY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?