Target Corp. et al v. AU Optronics Corporation et al

Filing 245

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO STRIKE AND MOTION TO SHORTEN TIME 243 244 (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 7/10/2012)

1
2
3
4
5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11
12
13

IN RE: TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL) ANTITRUST
LITIGATION
/

No. M 07-1827 SI
MDL No. 1827

This Order Relates to Direct Action cases filed
by:

Case Nos. C 09-5840 SI; C 09-4997 SI; C 104945 SI; C 10-0058 SI; C 10-5452 SI; C 104572

Motorola Mobility, Inc.; AT&T Mobility LLC;
Target Corporation; Costco Wholesale Corp.;
Eastman Kodak Company; and Best Buy Co.,
Inc., et al.

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’
MOTION TO STRIKE AND MOTION TO
SHORTEN TIME
/

14
15

Plaintiffs have filed two motions: one to strike several of defendants’ motions for summary

16

judgment1, and one to shorten time. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the Court finds these matters

17

suitable for disposition without oral argument.

18

Pursuant to the Court’s Standing Order, defendants are GRANTED leave to file their motions

19

for summary judgment. Accordingly, the Court DENIES both of plaintiffs’ motions. Master Docket

20

Nos. 6117 and 6118.

21

IT IS SO ORDERED.

22
23

Dated: July 10, 2012
SUSAN ILLSTON
United States District Judge

24
25
26
27
1

28

Master Docket Nos. 5417, 5849, 5869, 5875, 5979, 5985, 6020, 6054, 6080, 6083, 6093, and

6111.