Target Corp. et al v. AU Optronics Corporation et al

Filing 25

ORDER re: STIPULATION OF EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT TATUNG COMPANY OF AMERICA TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/4/2011)

Target Corp. et al v. AU Optronics Corporation et al

Doc. 25

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP JOEL S. SANDERS, SBN 107234, [e-mail] RACHEL S. BRASS, SBN 219301, [e-mail] REBECCA JUSTICE LAZARUS, SBN 227330, [e-mail] 555 Mission Street, Suite 3000 San Francisco, California 94105-2933 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: 415.393.8306 Attorneys for Defendant TATUNG COMPANY OF AMERICA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN RE: TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL) ANTITRUST LITIGATION This Document Relates to Individual Case No. 3:10-cv-04945-SI TARGET CORP., et. al.,

CASE NO. 03:10-cv-04945-SI MDL NO. 3:07-MD-01827-SI STIPULATION OF EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT TATUNG COMPANY OF AMERICA TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Date Action Filed: November 1, 2010

15 Plaintiff, 16 v. 17 AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION, et al., 18 Defendants. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP

The undersigned counsel, on behalf of Plaintiffs Target Corporation, Sears, Roebuck and Co., Kmart Corporation, Old Comp Inc., Good Guys, Inc., RadioShack Corporation, and Newegg Inc. (collectively, "Plaintiffs"), and Defendant Tatung Company of America ("Tatung") hereby stipulate and agree as follows: WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed a Complaint in the above-captioned case against Defendant Tatung and other defendants, on November 1, 2010; WHEREAS, on January 27, 2011, Plaintiffs entered into a stipulation with defendants AU Optronics Corporation, AU Optronics Corporation America, Chi Mei Corporation, Chimei Innolux Corporation (f/k/a Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corporation), Chi Mei Optoelectronics USA, Inc., CMO 1
Stipulation of Extension of Time For Defendant Tatung Company of America to Respond to Complaint; [Proposed] Order, Case No.: 3:10-CV-05625-SI; MDL No. 3:07-MD-01827-SI
Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP

Japan Co. Ltd., Nexgen Mediatech,Inc., Nexgen Mediatech USA, Inc., Epson Imaging Devices Corporation, Epson Electronics America, lnc., LG Display Co. Ltd., LG Display America, lnc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Sharp Corporation, Sharp Electronics Corporation, Toshiba Corporation, Toshiba America Electronic Components, Inc., Toshiba Mobile Display Co., Ltd., and Toshiba America Information Systems ("Stipulating Defendants") whereby Plaintiffs agreed that Stipulating Defendants' deadline to move to dismiss, answer, or otherwise respond to the Complaint would be 90 days from the execution of the stipulation; and WHEREAS, on January 28, 2011, this Court previously approved the stipulation between Plaintiffs and the Stipulating Defendants; WHEREAS, on February 16, 2011, Plaintiffs entered into a stipulation with defendant HannStar Display Corporation ("HannStar") whereby Plaintiffs agreed that HannStar's deadline to move to dismiss, answer, or otherwise respond to the Complaint would be April 27, 2011, which is the same response date for the Stipulating Defendants as established by the Stipulation and Order Regarding Service and Scheduling entered by the Court on January 28, 2011; WHEREAS, on February 18, 2011, this Court previously approved the stipulation between Plaintiffs and HannStar; WHEREAS Tatung acknowledges that Plaintiffs served the Complaint on Tatung on February 17, 2011 and Plaintiffs acknowledge that this stipulation does not constitute a waiver by Tatung of any other substantive or procedural defense, including but not limited to the defenses of lack of personal or subject matter jurisdiction and improper venue; WHEREAS, Plaintiffs and Tatung have reached an agreement to extend the time within which Tatung must move against, answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs' Complaint such that Tatung's response will be due at the same time as the responses of the Stipulating Defendants and HannStar; // //

2
Stipulation of Extension of Time For Defendant Tatung Company of America to Respond to Complaint; [Proposed] Order, Case No.: 3:10-CV-05625-SI; MDL No. 3:07-MD-01827-SI

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21

THEREFORE, the time within which Tatung must move against, answer, or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs' Complaint is extended until April 27, 2011. IT IS SO STIPULATED. Respectfully submitted, DATED: March 1, 2011 By: /s/ Rachel S. Brass Joel S. Sanders (CA Bar No. 107234) Rachel S. Brass (CA Bar No. 219301) Rebecca Justice Lazarus (CA Bar No. 227330) GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 555 Mission Street, Suite 3000 San Francisco, CA 94105 [phone] (Phone) [phone] (Facsimile) [e-mail] Attorneys for Defendant Tatung Company of America By: /s/ Jason C. Murray_______________________ Jason C. Murray (CA Bar No. 169806) Crowell & Moring LLP 515 South Flower Street, 40th Floor [phone] (Phone) [phone] (Facsimile) [e-mail] Attorneys for Plaintiffs Target Corporation, Sears, Roebuck and Co., Kmart Corporation, Old Comp Inc., Good Guys, Inc., RadioShack Corporation, and Newegg Inc. Pursuant to General Order 45, Part X-B, the filer attests that concurrence in the filing of

22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP

this document has been obtained from the signatories to this document. PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

3/3/11 ___________________________________ Date Entered 3

_________________________________________ Honorable Judge Susan Illston

Stipulation of Extension of Time For Defendant Tatung Company of America to Respond to Complaint; [Proposed] Order, Case No.: 3:10-CV-05625-SI; MDL No. 3:07-MD-01827-SI

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP

DECLARATION OF SERVICE I, Elizabeth Sperry, declare as follows: I am employed in the County of San Francisco, State of California; I am over the age of eighteen years and am not a party to this action; my business address is 555 Mission Street, Suite 3000, San Francisco 94105, in said County and State. On March 1, 2011, I served the within: STIPULATION OF EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT TATUNG COMPANY OF AMERICA TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER to all interested parties as follows: BY ECF (ELECTRONIC CASE FILING): I e-filed the above-detailed documents utilizing the
United States District Court, Northern District of California's mandated ECF (Electronic Case Filing) service on March 1, 2011. Counsel of record are required by the Court to be registered e-filers, and as such are automatically e-served with a copy of the documents upon confirmation of e-filing.

I certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct, that the foregoing document was printed on recycled paper, and that this Declaration of Service was executed by me on March 1, 2011, at San Francisco, California.

_____ /s:/ Elizabeth Sperry_________ Elizabeth Sperry

101028300_1.DOC

4
Stipulation of Extension of Time For Defendant Tatung Company of America to Respond to Complaint; [Proposed] Order, Case No.: 3:10-CV-05625-SI; MDL No. 3:07-MD-01827-SI