Target Corp. et al v. AU Optronics Corporation et al

Filing 27

ORDER VACATING 3/25/11 HEARING RE: MOTION TO SERVE (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/8/2011)

Download PDF
Target Corp. et al v. AU Optronics Corporation et al Doc. 27 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP JOEL S. SANDERS, SBN 107234, JSanders@gibsondunn.com RACHEL S. BRASS, SBN 219301, RBrass@gibsondunn.com REBECCA JUSTICE LAZARUS, SBN 227330, RJustice@gibsondunn.com SERENA G. LIU, SBN 264977, SGLiu@gibsondunn.com 555 Mission Street Suite 3000 San Francisco, California 94105-2933 Telephone: 415.393.8200 Facsimile: 415.393.8306 Attorneys for Defendant CHUNGHWA PICTURE TUBES, LTD. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA IN RE: TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL) ANTITRUST LITIGATION _______________________________________ This Document Related to Individual Case No. C V:10-4945 SI TARGET CORP.; SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO.; KMART CORP.; OLD COMP INC.; GOOD GUYS, INC.; RADIOSHACK CORP.; NEWEGG INC., Plaintiffs, v. AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION, AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AMERICA, INC.; CHI MEI OPTOELECTRONICS CORPORATION; CHI MEI OPTOELECTRONICS USA, INC.; CMO JAPAN CO. LTD.; NEXGEN MEDIATECH, INC.; NEXGEN MEDIATECH USA, INC.; CHUNGHWA PICTURE TUBES LTD.; TATUNG COMPANY OF AMERICA, INC.; EPON IMAGING DEVICES CORPORATION; EPSON ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.; HANNSTAR DISPLAY CORPORATION; LG DISPLAY CO. LTD.; LG DISPLAY AMERICA, INC.; SAMSUNG SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.; SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.; SHARP 1 CASE NO. 03:07-MD-01827 SI INDIVIDUAL CASE NO. C V:10-4945 SI STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER WAIVING ORAL ARGUMENT ON PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR ORDER AUTHORIZING PLAINTIFFS TO SERVE CHUNGHWA PICTURE TUBES, LTD. THROUGH ITS U.S. COUNSEL Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Waiving Oral Argument, Case No.: MDL 07-01827 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP CORPORATION; SHARP ELECTRONICS CORPORATION; TOSHIBA CORPORATION; TOSHIBA AMERICA ELECTRONICS COMPONENTS, INC.; TOSHIBA MOBILE DISPLAY TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.; TOSHIBA AMERICA INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC., Defendants. The undersigned counsel, on behalf of Plaintiffs Target Corporation, Sears, Roebuck and Co., Kmart Corporation, Old Comp Inc., Good Guys, Inc., RadioShack Corporation, and Newegg Inc. (collectively "Plaintiffs") and Defendant Chunghwa Picture Tubes, Ltd. ("Chunghwa"), request that the Court take off calendar the hearing on Plaintiffs' Motion for Order Authorizing Plaintiffs to Serve Defendant Chunghwa Picture Tubes, Ltd. Through Its U.S. Counsel (the "Motion") and rule based on the papers. WHEREAS Plaintiffs filed the Motion on February 15, 2011 and Chunghwa filed a Memorandum in Opposition on March 4, 2011; WHEREAS Plaintiffs and Chunghwa agree that the issue has been fully briefed; and WHEREAS the Court has previously heard argument and ruled on substantially similar motions in related cases; THEREFORE, Plaintiffs and Chunghwa, by their respective counsel, stipulate and agree to waive oral argument on the Motion, and submit to the Court's ruling on the papers that have been filed. The parties agree that the hearing scheduled for 9:00 a.m. on March 25, 2011 may be taken off // // // // // // // 2 Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Waiving Oral Argument, Case No.: MDL 07-01827 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP calendar, subject to any further direction of the Court. IT IS SO STIPULATED. Respectfully submitted, DATED: March 4, 2011 By: _________/s/ Jason C. Murray___________ Jason C. Murray, SBN 169806 CROWELL & MORING LLP 515 South Flower St., 40th Floor Los Angeles, California 90071 Telephone: (213) 443-5582 Facsimile: (213) 622-2690 Counsel for Plaintiffs Target Corporation, Sears, Roebuck and Co., Kmart Corporation, Old Comp Inc., Good Guys, Inc., RadioShack Corporation, and Newegg Inc. By: __________/s/ Rachel S. Brass_____________ Joel S. Sanders, SBN 107234 Rachel S. Brass, SBN 219301 GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 555 Mission Street Suite 3000 San Francisco, California 94105-2933 Telephone: (415) 393-8200 Facsimile: (415) 393-8306 Counsel for Defendant Chunghwa Picture Tubes, Ltd. Attestation: The filer of this document attests that the concurrence of the other signatory thereto has been obtained. PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 3/8/11 ___________________________________ Date Entered ________________________________________ Honorable Judge Susan Illston 3 Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Waiving Oral Argument, Case No.: MDL 07-01827 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP DECLARTION OF SERVICE I, Carol Dickerson, declare as follows: I am employed in the County of San Francisco, State of California; I am over the age of eighteen years and am not a party to this action; my business address is 555 Mission Street, Suite 3000, San Francisco, California, 94105, in said County and State. On March 4, 2011, I served the within: NOTICE OF SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER to all named counsel of record as follows: BY ECF (ELECTRONIC CASE FILING): I e-filed the above-detailed documents utilizing the United States District Court, Northern District of California's mandated ECF (Electronic Case Filing) service on March 4, 2011. Counsel of record are required by the Court to be registered e-filers, and as such are automatically e-served with a copy of the documents upon confirmation of e-filing. I certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct, that the foregoing document(s) were printed on recycled paper, and that this Declaration of Service was executed by me on March 4, 2011, at San Francisco, California. /s/ Carol Dickerson 4 Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Waiving Oral Argument, Case No.: MDL 07-01827

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?