Target Corp. et al v. AU Optronics Corporation et al

Filing 29

ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT (CHUNGHWA) (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/17/2011)

Download PDF
Target Corp. et al v. AU Optronics Corporation et al Doc. 29 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP JOEL S. SANDERS, SBN 107234, JSanders@gibsondunn.com RACHEL S. BRASS, SBN 219301, RBrass@gibsondunn.com REBECCA JUSTICE LAZARUS, SBN 227330, RJustice@gibsondunn.com 555 Mission Street, Suite 3000 San Francisco, California 94105-2933 Telephone: 415.393.8200 Facsimile: 415.393.8306 Attorneys for Defendant CHUNGHWA PICTURE TUBES, LTD. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA IN RE: TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL) ANTITRUST LITIGATION This Document Relates to Individual Case No. 3:10-cv-04945-SI TARGET CORP., et. al., CASE NO. 03:10-cv-04945-SI MDL NO. 3:07-MD-01827-SI STIPULATION OF EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT CHUNGHWA PICTURE TUBES, LTD. TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Date Action Filed: November 1, 2010 15 Plaintiff, 16 v. 17 AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION, et al., 18 Defendants. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP The undersigned counsel, on behalf of Plaintiffs Target Corporation, Sears, Roebuck and Co., Kmart Corporation, Old Comp Inc., Good Guys, Inc., RadioShack Corporation, and Newegg Inc. (collectively, "Plaintiffs"), and Defendant Chunghwa Picture Tubes, Ltd. ("Chunghwa") hereby stipulate and agree as follows: WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed a Complaint in the above-captioned case against Defendant Chunghwa and other defendants, on November 1, 2010; WHEREAS, on March 8, 2011, the Court granted Plaintiffs' motion to serve Chunghwa through its U.S. counsel pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(f)(3); 1 Stipulation of Extension of Time For Defendant Chunghwa Picture Tubes, Ltd. to Respond to Complaint; [Proposed] Order, Case No.: 3:10-CV-05625-SI; MDL No. 3:07-MD-01827-SI Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP WHEREAS, in light of that Order, the parties agree that such service may occur via email to counsel but that such agreement does not constitute a waiver of Chunghwa's objection to service of the complaint and summons through U.S. counsel; WHEREAS, Plaintiffs and Chunghwa have reached an agreement, pursuant to Civil L.R. 61(a), to extend the time within which Chunghwa must move against, answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs' Complaint; WHEREAS, this extension will not alter the date of any event or any deadline already fixed by the Court; and WHEREAS, the Court has previously approved stipulations between Plaintiffs and certain other defendants extending those defendants' time to dismiss, answer, or otherwise respond to the Complaint until April 27, 2011; THEREFORE, the time within which Chunghwa must move against, answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs' Complaint is extended until April 27, 2011. IT IS SO STIPULATED. Respectfully submitted, DATED: March 10, 2011 By: /s/ Rachel S. Brass Joel S. Sanders (CA Bar No. 107234) Rachel S. Brass (CA Bar No. 219301) Rebecca Justice Lazarus (CA Bar No. 227330) GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 555 Mission Street, Suite 3000 San Francisco, CA 94105 (415)393.8200 (Phone) (415)393.8306 (Facsimile) rbrass@gibsondunn.com Attorneys for Chunghwa Picture Tubes, Ltd. By: /s/ Jason C. Murray_______________________ Jason C. Murray (CA Bar No. 169806) Crowell & Moring LLP 515 South Flower Street, 40th Floor (213) 422-5582 (Phone) (213) 622-2690 (Facsimile) jmurray@crowell.com 2 Stipulation of Extension of Time For Defendant Chunghwa Picture Tubes, Ltd. to Respond to Complaint; [Proposed] Order, Case No.: 3:10-CV-05625-SI; MDL No. 3:07-MD-01827-SI 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP Attorneys for Plaintiffs Target Corporation, Sears, Roebuck and Co., Kmart Corporation, Old Comp Inc., Good Guys, Inc., RadioShack Corporation, and Newegg Inc. Pursuant to General Order 45, Part X-B, the filer attests that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the signatories to this document. PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 3/16/11 ___________________________________ Date Entered _________________________________________ Honorable Judge Susan Illston 3 Stipulation of Extension of Time For Defendant Chunghwa Picture Tubes, Ltd. to Respond to Complaint; [Proposed] Order, Case No.: 3:10-CV-05625-SI; MDL No. 3:07-MD-01827-SI 1 DECLARATION OF SERVICE 2 I, Robin McBain, declare as follows: 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 101037291_1.DOC I am employed in the County of San Francisco, State of California; I am over the age of eighteen years and am not a party to this action; my business address is 555 Mission Street, Suite 3000, San Francisco 94105, in said County and State. On March 15, 2011, I served the within: STIPULATION OF EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT TATUNG COMPANY OF AMERICA TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER to all interested parties as follows: BY ECF (ELECTRONIC CASE FILING): I e-filed the above-detailed documents utilizing the United States District Court, Northern District of California's mandated ECF (Electronic Case Filing) service on March 15, 2011. Counsel of record are required by the Court to be registered e-filers, and as such are automatically e-served with a copy of the documents upon confirmation of e-filing. I certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct, that the foregoing document was printed on recycled paper, and that this Declaration of Service was executed by me on March 15, 2011, at San Francisco, California. _____ /s:/ Robin McBain___________ Robin McBain 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP Declaration of Service; Case No.: 3:10-CV-05625-SI; MDL No. 3:07-MD-01827-SI

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?