Target Corp. et al v. AU Optronics Corporation et al

Filing 366

ORDER granting stipulation of dismissal 6735 . Signed by Judge Susan Illston on 9/18/12. (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/19/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

12

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

13

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

14
15

THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:

Master Docket No. C M:07-01827 SI

16

In re TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL) ANTITRUST
LITIGATION

MDL No. 1827

17

[PROPOSED] ORDER
This Document Relates To:

18
19

Target Corp., et al. v. AU Optronics Corporation,
et al., Case 10-cv-4945-SI

20
21
22
23
24

The Court, having considered the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing
therefore, orders as follows:
1.

Claims asserted by Plaintiffs Target Corporation, Sears, Roebuck and Co., Kmart

25

Corporation, Old Comp Inc., Good Guys, Inc., RadioShack Corporation, and Newegg, Inc.,

26

against Defendants Epson Imaging Devices Corporation and Epson Electronics America, Inc. are

27

dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

28
C ROWELL
& M ORING LLP
ATTO RNEY S AT LAW

2.

Each party shall bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees.
[Proposed] Order
Case No. 07-01827 SI

1
2

3.

This Order does not affect the rights or claims of Plaintiff against any other

defendant or alleged co-conspirator in the above-captioned litigation.

3
4
5

IT IS SO ORDERED.
18 TH
SEPT
This ____ day of ______, 2012

6
7
Hon. Susan Y. Illston
United States District Court Judge

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
C ROWELL
& M ORING LLP
ATTO RNEY S AT LAW

-2-

[Proposed] Order
Case No. 07-01827-SI