Target Corp. et al v. AU Optronics Corporation et al

Filing 487

ORDER granting (8156) Stipulation in case 3:07-md-01827-SI to shorten time on motion for separate trial (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/21/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

CHRISTOPHER A. NEDEAU (CA SBN 81297)
CARL L. BLUMENSTEIN (CA SBN 124158)
NOSSAMAN LLP
50 California Street, 34th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendants
AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION and
AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AMERICA

8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18

IN RE: TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL)
ANTITRUST LITIGATION

No: 3:07-md-1827 SI
MDL No. 1827

This Document Relates to:
Best Buy v. AU Optronics Corporation, et al.,
Case No. 3:10-cv-04572

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
TO SHORTEN TIME FOR HEARING ON
MOTION FOR SEPARATE TRIAL

Best Buy v. Toshiba Corporation, et al.,
Case No. 3:12-cv-04114

Date:
Time:
Place:
Judge:

Eastman Kodak Company v. Epson Imaging
Devices Corp., et al., Case No. 3:10-cv-05452

July 9, 2013
3:30 p.m.
Courtroom 10, 19th Floor
Hon. Susan Illston

Target Corp., et al., v. AU Optronics Corporation,
et al., Case No. 3:10-cv-04945

19
20

WHEREAS Defendants AU Optronics Corporation and AU Optronics Corporation America

21

(collectively “the AUO defendants”) intend to file a Motion for Separate Trial of the above-captioned

22

Eastman Kodak action and seek to have said motion heard at the Final Pretrial Conference scheduled for

23

July 9, 2013;

24

WHEREAS, counsel for the AUO defendants have met and conferred with counsel for all

25

remaining parties in the above-captioned actions with regard to a hearing date and briefing schedule for

26

that motion;

27
28

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED between counsel for the plaintiffs and
defendants, and subject to the concurrence of the Court, that:
279124_2.DOC
1
Case Nos. 3:07-md-1827 SI and 3:10-CV-05452 SI
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO SHORTEN TIME FOR HEARING ON MOTION FOR SEPARATE TRIAL

1
2
3
4

1.

10:00
The AUO defendants’ Motion for a Separate Trial will be heard at 3:30 p.m. on July 9,

2013.

1
2.

Opposition papers shall be filed no later than July 3, 2013 and any reply papers shall be
5
filed no later than noon on July 8, 2013.

5
6
7

Respectfully submitted,
Dated: June 19, 2013

By:

8
9

12

Dated: June 19, 2013

14

Dated: June 19, 2013

19

21
22
23
24
25

NIXON PEABODY LLP
By:

18

20

/s/ Jerome A. Murphy
Jerome A. Murphy

Attorneys for Plaintiffs Target Corporation; Sears,
Roebuck & Co.; Kmart Corp.; RadioShack Corp.;
Old Comp, Inc.; Newegg, Inc.; and Good Guys Inc.

15

17

CROWELL & MORING LLP
By:

13

16

/s/ Carl L. Blumenstein
Carl L. Blumenstein

Attorneys for Defendants AUO Optronics
Corporation and AUO Optronics Corporation
America

10
11

NOSSAMAN LLP

/s/ John R. Foote
John R. Foote

Attorneys for Plaintiff Eastman Kodak Company
Dated: June 19, 2013

ROBINS KAPLAN MILLER & CIRESI LLP
By:

/s/Roman M. Silberfeld
Roman M. Silberfeld

Attorneys for Plaintiffs Best Buy Co., Inc.; Best Buy
Purchasing LLC; Best Buy Enterprise Services, Inc.;
Best Buy Stores, L.P.; Bestbuy.com, LLC; and
Magnolia Hi-Fi, Inc.

26
27
28
279124_2.DOC
2
Case Nos. 3:07-md-1827 SI and 3:10-CV-05452 SI
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO SHORTEN TIME FOR HEARING ON MOTION FOR SEPARATE TRIAL

1

Dated: June 19, 2013

2

By:

3

6

Dated: June 19, 2013

MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP
By

7
8

/s/ Brad Brian
Brad Brian

Attorneys for Defendants LG Display America, Inc.
and LG Display Co. Ltd.

9
10

/s/ Robert E. Freitas
Robert E. Freitas

Attorneys for Defendant
HannStar Display Corporation

4
5

FREITAS TSENG & KAUFMAN LLP

Dated: June 19, 2013

11

WHITE & CASE LLP
By

12

/s/ Christopher M. Curran
Christopher M. Curran

Attorneys for Toshiba Corporation, Toshiba
Mobile Display Co., Ltd., Toshiba America
Electronic Components, Inc. and Toshiba
America Information Systems, Inc.

13
14
15

ATTESTATION: Pursuant to General Order 45, Part X-B, the filer attests that concurrence in

16
17

the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the signatories.

18
ORDER

19
20
21
22
23

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

AS AMENDED

6/20/13
The Honorable Susan Illston
United States District Court Judge

24
25
26
27
28
279124_2.DOC
3
Case Nos. 3:07-md-1827 SI and 3:10-CV-05452 SI
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO SHORTEN TIME FOR HEARING ON MOTION FOR SEPARATE TRIAL